So that would put it just under 9 to just above 10 seconds assuming all A's?
I will be bringing all A's in under 12. 
When I shot it at Nats, I shot it in 11.04. With 6 C-hits.
That got me 25th.
...but it was easier to shoot, since the side targets were wide open, not partially covered by the no-shoot as will happen in this classifier. We'll see how it goes this time...
I was wondering about this, I thought they were constantly evolving based on the best it has ever been shot.
That is what we are told, as least in terms of it being an average of the best it has ever been shot over time. And yet, "Can You Count" has the exact same hit factor for all divisions except for revolver, AND it is the same hit factor that Max Michel shot in an area match in Open division.
Other examples abound, many of which have NOT been adjusted
ever. Matter of fact, an entire set (almost all of the 99 series) of HHF for one particular division is exactly 5% higher than another division's HHFs---so it certainly wasn't based on any "best runs" in that first division.
So yeah, what they say is unfortunately, NOT currently what they do. It is rather a large argument on the BrianEnos forums at the moment, and it'll be interesting (what with our new Executive Director and all) to see what happens.
Doesn't make USPSA any less fun---but it IS true that sometimes you get a classifier where you feel like you've had a great run, and your national percentage is woefully low.
