General Categories > Carry Issues
Another Victory For Open Carry!
farmerbob:
I do understand fully what your talking about, although I bet you can't list one thing we have gained from these actions. The negatives just keep adding up.
Can you tell me what is to be gained by giving gun owners a negative image in the public's eye?
Mntnman:
People are talking about it. Change for the better will happen, that is a plus.
A few, ahemm, "gun supporters" will realize that any stance that includes "I support thr 2nd amendment but..... " is not supportive. We continue to allow the antis room to divide us and until we all get in the boat and row in the same direction, we will not get very far.
Husker_Fan:
First, even if I agreed with you this was a second amendment issue, the adage that just because something is legal doesn't make it right applies.
Second, I support the second amendment. No "buts." It simply doesn't apply to private property owners who are free to ban idiots from their property.
By your logic, I should be furious that some business owner won't let people come into their businesses, pop open a laptop, and start streaming hardcore pornography because there's a first amendment.
Mntnman:
Um, no. I fully support the business's right to ask people not to carry there. You got lost somewhere.
farmerbob:
There's a huge difference in the right to put up no gun signs and having the law backing them.
I think everyone would agree that private property owners should have the rights to put up signage.
No gun signs should not carry any more weight than a sign that says no shirt no shoes no service.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version