No longer a social stigma to be on welfare.
When the State took over benevolence from the churches things went to pot, literally. Churches, as a rule, were well known in the community and knew the community well. They could tell the difference between someone down on the luck and the run of the mill freeloaders. The freeloaders were shown the door, those down on the luck were given a helping hand ... to find a job and a place to live, with enough food and clothes to get them there.
When my wife and I were helping at a food bank five or so years ago we noticed that of the 120 or so who regularly showed up each Tuesday for free food about 1/3rd of them were using smartphones my wife and I couldn't afford. They were driving cars which were 1/2 as old, or less, than our 2002 Saturn SL2. A couple of them lived less than a block from us in homes that were equal or better than ours (1,800 sq ft, three bdrms, two baths, heat with a candle, cool with an ice cube, etc...) and they wore the latest makeup, bling and shoes. And, they had jobs. At least I'd see them drive to work (or panhandle?) every day. Several were morbidly obese. I'd see them at Sams or Walmart pushing carts loaded to the hilt with junk food. About 1/3rd were obviously in need, based on their physical attrition, but most of those were Muslims wearing burkas or from former Iron Curtain countries. The remaining were minorities who didn't appear to be gaudy or poor.
How could you be certain you were not feeding the addiction and not the homeless?