General Categories > Information Arsenal

President Coward by Bill Whittle

(1/2) > >>

OnTheFly:
I've always liked Whittle's presentation of the information.  It is not over the top like I consider Glenn Beck to be. 

http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-president-coward

Fly

Gary:
I watched a Beck video yesterday released during the last election, and if a few more people had seen it, maybe we would not be in this mess.

Any information we can distribute about this usirper,  we need to post it.  Thanks.

OnTheFly:
Information is good.  However, IMHO we don't win people over to our way of thinking when that information is presented with a bunch of over-the-top emotion.  It is similar to when I get communication from the union which is rife with emotional rhetoric.  It does nothing to sway me in favor of their cause and does everything to drive me further away from it.

Whittle's presentations do have emotion, but it is not dripping with the self-righteous indignation attitude that Beck displays.  Though other's may see him differently.

Fly

Mntnman:
I can't listen to Beck. I don't like the presentation. Many do, though. I am glad he is there as one more voice that appeals many people.

One of my pet peeves about him is when he is delivering an emotional sermon, then stops on a dime and pimps Goldline in a completely different inflection. So fake.

Gumby:
I've always liked Whittle's presentation of the information - Fly

- Perhaps Bill Whittle's strongest video presentation to date - 

This link needs to be forwarded to every U.S. Rep and Senator in the nation along with a demand for their public response.  Do they agree with BW's conclusion that Obama is a coward -  or not?

Emailing the Honorable Terry, Johanns and Fischer IMMEDIATELY... one of many, I trust!... as a Defense concern... here's the body of my correspondence:

I respectfully request your public response to the President Coward video by Bill Whittle:  http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-president-coward

Whittle states quite forcefully that President Obama's role as commander in chief is fundamentally undermined by his narcissistic desire to place his public persona and potential legacy above national security issues.  In Whittle's view, Obama has repeatedly chosen the protection of his image as more important than America's defense today and tomorrow, and more important than the lives of our military personnel, the lives of other US citizens in harms way and our military's operational secrecy.

Are the President's actions and inactions treasonous, just routine Washington politics, or something in between?

What say you?  I await your public response on this most critical issue.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page