General Categories > General Firearm Discussion
9mm
depserv:
--- Quote from: David Hineline on October 03, 2014, 11:38:33 PM ---FBI and the police dept. who follow their every move are not going back to 9 MM because it is the best ballistic round. It is due to Political Correctness requiring that tiny men and tiny women get to be police and secret service and military and on and on. The lower recoil of the 9 MM improves the shootabillity of the new smaller/weaker public servants.
--- End quote ---
This is what I was suggesting in my post when I made reference to liberal butt-kissers. It seems like one reason given for the FBI going from the 10mm to the 10mm lite and then the .40 was that agents with smaller hands had trouble with the recoil of the 10. So, what agents are more likely to have smaller hands? Hmmmmmm..... This though is something I was told by someone I considered to be reliable but I do not know it to be a fact. If it is factual though, it's worth making known, because it's another example of harm being caused by the imposition of liberalism as an official state religion.
Lmbass14:
--- Quote from: sjwsti on October 01, 2014, 12:25:17 PM ---^This^
Thanks JT, you just saved me some time today.
Can anyone tell me exactly what part of a human ballistic gel is supposed to represent? Does it simulate a solid organ like the liver? Or a hollow organ like the stomach? Maybe lung tissue? Maybe the bladder (empty or full)? You cant ignore the widely varying organ characteristics that exist inside real human beings and how that effects energy transfer.
Kinetic energy + target tissue characteristics = wounding potential.
- Shawn
--- End quote ---
Great question. I was thinking the same thing.
GreyGeek:
--- Quote from: depserv on October 04, 2014, 11:26:12 AM ---So, what agents are more likely to have smaller hands? Hmmmmmm.....
--- End quote ---
You mean the reason why my wife couldn't handle my 9mm Nano but has no problems with a mouse gun?
depserv:
--- Quote from: GreyGeek on October 04, 2014, 12:47:40 PM ---You mean the reason why my wife couldn't handle my 9mm Nano but has no problems with a mouse gun?
--- End quote ---
(looking over my shoulders both ways to be sure there are no liberal thought police in the area) Yeah, something like that...
GreyGeek:
--- Quote from: depserv on October 07, 2014, 08:07:43 AM ---(looking over my shoulders both ways to be sure there are no liberal thought police in the area) Yeah, something like that...
--- End quote ---
That's what I thought. That guy who ran into the White House and was tackled just outside the Oval Office blew through the guard at the door. Guess what...
I'll be politically incorrect but biologically accurate: Women do not make good guards, soldiers or policemen because those positions often require more physical strength and endurance than the average women possesses. However, it take no muscle to push a button or pull a trigger. Female fighter and helicopter pilots can pull higher Gs than male pilots and at random times of the month can be extremely aggressive. They are also willing:
If they are captured, they have more to loose, so I suspect that in combat they'd fight as hard as they could, if all they do is pull triggers. But while carrying 70 lbs of weapons, ammo and gear? They do not have the Testosterone levels that males do, so they do not have the muscle mass nor endurance that can and often is required in a platoon patrol, the occasional exception not withstanding.
We're talking bell curves here. Strong women often overlap weak men, but the strength of the average women is well below the strength of the average man.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version