General Categories > General Firearm Discussion
80% lower, after you die!
AAllen:
I would agree with tstuart on this one; yes the language is should be, but the ATF would enforce it like it says shall be if the firearm in question was to transfer and the courts would side with the ATF.
Mali:
I agree.
A good general rule of thumb when dealing with government regs and documents is to read them in the most restrictive way possible as, regrettably, that will be how the drones will use them.
Phantom:
I think People are getting hung on the wording semantics here.
If you build one for personal use only....then your considered a homebuilder.
But if you try to sell the same weapon.....then you have become and are now considered a manufacturer at that point.
newfalguy101:
--- Quote from: Phantom on October 20, 2014, 12:54:53 PM ---I think People are getting hung on the wording semantics here.
If you build one for personal use only....then your considered a homebuilder.
But if you try to sell the same weapon.....then you have become and are now considered a manufacturer at that point.
--- End quote ---
Umm no...................
AWick:
Couple of things. 1) semantics matter, especially in not wanting to go to prison. 2) I don't have an understanding or have seen a consensus on what to do with a home built lower after you die and want to pass it on to your children. So, an answer of "ummm no" without a reasonable response doesn't really further the debate in a meaningful way. Maybe you could elaborate, not just in the homebuilder and not selling it, but more to what the OP was enquiring about.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version