General Categories > Carry Issues

Gateway Mall

<< < (2/3) > >>

gsd:

--- Quote from: bullit on November 19, 2014, 07:08:31 AM ---
Now that's funny considering some of the "sluggos" I've seen there .....

--- End quote ---

You just never know where Paul Blart is concealing his firearm. It could be under that fat roll, oh wait that's just a sandwich.

eshold:
Carry on!

DR4NRA:
 
--- Quote from: Dan W on November 18, 2014, 08:14:46 PM ---A code of conduct does not meet the notification requirements stated in the administrative code of the Concealed Handgun act, and frankly I have shopped in Gateway Mall for about 20 years and I have never once laid eyes on that code of conduct so I would have to say that it does not meet the requirement for "conspicuous notice"

--- End quote ---

That's not what was said in a different post about the code of conduct at south pointe pavilions in a previous post.  On page 1 from NE Bull.

http://nebraskafirearms.org/forum/index.php/topic,12777.0.html

 Scheels has been getting dissed because of this, so yesterday I talked with the store manager. CC is okay, as long as the weapon is never un-holstered in the store.
 OC is not allowed.

Dan W:

--- Quote from: DR4NRA on December 14, 2014, 09:13:28 AM ---That's not what was said in a different post about the code of conduct at south pointe pavilions in a previous post.  On page 1 from NE Bull.

--- End quote ---

What's your point?

I am not NE Bull and I have always maintained that a code of conduct does not meet the requirement for conspicuous signage, and I have repeatedly acknowledged that Scheels management has OK'd CCW.

So if we have explicit permission from the Management of Scheels, how does that jive with the code of conduct for the mall?

The NSP administrative code strongly suggests that conspicuous signage should be placed at eye level on every public entrance to a place or premises. I interpret that to mean if I can not see any signage on the door to the store I am entering, then I am not in violation of the rule.

I am not required to roam the halls or the grounds looking for reasons to limit my freedom because conspicuous signage does not require one to search for it

Mali:

--- Quote from: Dan W on December 14, 2014, 11:45:08 AM ---The NSP administrative code strongly suggests that conspicuous signage should be placed at eye level on every public entrance to a place or premises. I interpret that to mean if I can not see any signage on the door to the store I am entering, then I am not in violation of the rule.

I am not required to roam the halls or the grounds looking for reasons to limit my freedom because conspicuous signage does not require one to search for it

--- End quote ---
I believe we said the same thing about Oakview Mall in Omaha.  They do not have placards in place but do have a note on the Code of Conduct that is mounted by the bathrooms just in from the western entrance.  I have always been "forced" to enter through the department store entrance as part of my role as Official Spousal Cargo Carrier so  I only know because someone else had seen it there, and I agree that this doesn't seem to fulfill the requirements for notification per the regs.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page