General Categories > General Firearm Discussion

Annual Physical - blood lead levels tested

(1/2) > >>

RLMoeller:
Had my annual physical this month and decided to have my lead level tested.   Doctor knows I'm involved in numerous firearms activities including reloading.  He said he hadn't been asked for lead levels to be checked before.  I don't worry much about my doctor sharing information about my firearms ownership with the government because of how public that is for me already.

I was quite surprised when I looked through the blood test results.  The sheet for the Lead test says "Results reported to the State Health Department".   Does anyone know why that would be?  My results showed <3.3 with a reference range of <40.0.  So there isn't anything unusual with the results.  Is this a test that reporting to the State is required by law?   The tests were performed by PLS Omaha.  I have not contacted them yet to ask why the results get reported to the state.

UPCrawfish:
Looks like it might be a CDC Guideline to all laboratories that if they perform a lead level blood test, those results should be reported the state's department of health. 

http://www.cdc.gov/nceh/lead/data/national.htm

bullit:
Now you're on the list....

SemperFiGuy:
Good move to get the lead levels checked every so often.

Been doing mine at every annual physical checkup, because of reloading, shooting indoors, handling quite a bit of lead.  Lead Level has consistently been LL<3.3 micrograms/deciliter. 

(FWIW, onset of lead poisoning is generally considered to take place at 40 micrograms/deciliter.)

The thing we all have to watch out for is when the iron in our blood turns to lead in our butts.   Gettin' there.

sfg

JAK:

Did a quick web search and  under Nebraska Title 173 Chapter 1, the results of all lead tests need to be reported.  Title 173 Chapter 1 deals with communicable diseases and poisoning.

John K

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page