General Categories > General Firearm Discussion
ATF to reclassify armor piercing ammo
FarmerRick:
The Omaha Weird Herald has a story on this today. I guess they didn't bother to ask the NFOA for it's comments. ::)
FarmerRick:
If you folks really want to see what we are up against as in anti-gunners and downright idiots, I suggest you read the OWH's Facebook post about the above mentioned article. Oy vey!!
https://www.facebook.com/WorldHerald?fref=nf
gsd:
--- Quote from: FarmerRick on March 02, 2015, 07:18:20 PM ---If you folks really want to see what we are up against as in anti-gunners and downright idiots, I suggest you read the OWH's Facebook post about the above mentioned article. Oy vey!!
https://www.facebook.com/WorldHerald?fref=nf
--- End quote ---
FFS...I feel stupider just for attempting to read some of those comments.
GreggL:
At this point, with it appearing that the ATF is making up whatever standards they want to achieve their goals
(as apposed to honoring the Constitution, or even following the law as it is written) does 7N6 ammo banned
last year, or the steel core 7.62x39 Russian made ammo banned in 1994, really meet the the standards as set
forth by law? Just wondering.
AAllen:
--- Quote from: GreggL on March 02, 2015, 10:15:32 PM ---At this point, with it appearing that the ATF is making up whatever standards they want to achieve their goals
(as apposed to honoring the Constitution, or even following the law as it is written) does 7N6 ammo banned
last year, or the steel core 7.62x39 Russian made ammo banned in 1994, really meet the the standards as set
forth by law? Just wondering.
--- End quote ---
Don't know about the 7n6 but the 7.62x39 and 5.45x39 both are constructed the same as the 7.62x54r that is still commonally available. So technically no it does not meet the discription given in the law passed by congress.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version