General Categories > General Firearm Discussion
Gun buybacks
DR4NRA:
This would be funny except that she(?) is serious. Unfortunately seriously off balance in the thought process.
newfalguy101:
--- Quote from: Dan W on May 09, 2015, 09:53:02 PM ---Come on guys! We know that LEO's are always exempt from the rules everyone else must live by...
--- End quote ---
Ahhhhhhhhhh, BUT, mustn't forget that those who run Buybacks are VERY adamant about saying the guns are NOT being bought by law enforcement, and that the police are NOT "involved".
Besides, exactly which agency would approve tax dollars being spent on junk that will be disposed of?? The guns are NOT being purchased on behalf of LEO's nor are they being purchase BY LEOs for duty use, ergo, the buybacks are NOT legal ( as far as handguns ) In Nebraska
tstuart34:
--- Quote from: newfalguy101 on May 10, 2015, 07:54:16 PM ---Ahhhhhhhhhh, BUT, mustn't forget that those who run Buybacks are VERY adamant about saying the guns are NOT being bought by law enforcement, and that the police are NOT "involved".
Besides, exactly which agency would approve tax dollars being spent on junk that will be disposed of?? The guns are NOT being purchased on behalf of LEO's nor are they being purchase BY LEOs for duty use, ergo, the buybacks are NOT legal ( as far as handguns ) In Nebraska
--- End quote ---
Just asking the question.... If the tax payers are buying the guns are they not being put on the city or companies books? Even if the buy back is being ran by some NY founded group either they would have to purchase the weapons for the said company or the idviuals would need to have a purchase permit or a CCP to pass money for the hardware.
Not arguing here just asking..8)
depserv:
I don't know how these things are normally done, but you'd think a private group could do one on its own with its own money if it wanted to, and the group could have a gun dealer handle each transaction so it was all legal. The likelihood of a group of liberal bigots doing something like this with its own money seems small though, since they love spending taxpayer money so much. But with, say for example, the Clinton Foundation having so much money, maybe they could do one.
If they do something like that though, as I said earlier, I think they should include a book buyback too, and see how many copies of the Constitution and the Bible they can get "off the streets," because in the end, those are what the liberal cult really wants to get rid of; civilian disarmament is just a means toward that end. They can get rid of history books that have not been made to fit in with liberal dogma too, and old manuals on grammar and style that were written before liberalism was the official state religion; these books oppress women, because they have sexist language in them (i.e., mankind instead of humankind, etc.). These make every bit as much sense as gun buybacks.
DR4NRA:
They can get rid of history books that have not been made to fit in with liberal dogma too, and old manuals on grammar and style that were written before liberalism was the official state religion; these books oppress women, because they have sexist language in them (i.e., mankind instead of humankind, etc.).
They already have.
All of the history and literature books have been sanitized over the years for the new teaching curriculum.
Mark Twain is now a bigot.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version