General Categories > Carry Issues
open carry in city parks
DR4NRA:
http://lincoln.ne.gov/city/attorn/lmc/ti12/ch1208.pdf
12.08.200 Weapons Prohibited in Parks and Park Facilities.
(a) It shall be unlawful for any person to possess or discharge, or cause to be discharged,
within any park or park facility, any firearm, including, but not limited to, any pistol, revolver,
shotgun, or rifle.
(b) It shall be unlawful for any person to possess or discharge, or cause to be discharged,
within any park or park facility, any air rifle, bow and arrow, crossbow, toy pistol, toy gun,
slingshot, or any other air, gas, manually operated or spring operated gun, weapon, apparatus, or
instrument designed or intended to be used for the purpose of throwing or projecting missiles of any
kind by any means whatsoever, whether the instrument is called by any name set forth above or by
any other name.
(c) Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Director of the Parks and Recreation Department
may designate areas in certain parks and park facilities to allow various organized programs to
engage in the activities described herein.
AND NO SIGNS. But if you want to be the test case have at it.
Link you might like to look at.
http://handgunlaw.us/documents/NECityLaws.pdf
Dan W:
12.08.200 is preempted for any valid CHP holder, and if there are no signs to meet state law requirements, then I will " keep calm and carry on"... And, yes I will be the test case if ever charged
DR4NRA:
Dan,
Can you please point me to the statute regarding that specifically under city or state.
Thanks.
Dan W:
The language is from LB430 passed in 2009...I am not certain of the statute it is found in anymore, but it is in the area limiting powers of cities
ETA statute is 18-1703
--- Quote ---Nebraska Revised Statute 18-1703
18-1703. Ownership, possession, and transportation of concealed handguns; power of cities and villages; existing ordinance, permit, or regulation; null and void.
Cities and villages shall not have the power to regulate the ownership, possession, or transportation of a concealed handgun, as such ownership, possession, or transportation is authorized under the Concealed Handgun Permit Act, except as expressly provided by state law, and shall not have the power to require registration of a concealed handgun owned, possessed, or transported by a permitholder under the act. Any existing city or village ordinance, permit, or regulation regulating the ownership, possession, or transportation of a concealed handgun, as such ownership, possession, or transportation is authorized under the act, except as expressly provided under state law, and any existing city or village ordinance, permit, or regulation requiring the registration of a concealed handgun owned, possessed, or transported by a permitholder under the act, is declared to be null and void as against any permitholder possessing a valid permit under the act.
Source
Laws 2009, LB430, § 5;
Laws 2010, LB817, § 2.
Cross References
Concealed Handgun Permit Act, see section 69-2427
--- End quote ---
OnTheFly:
--- Quote from: DR4NRA on June 17, 2015, 02:25:56 PM ---AND NO SIGNS. But if you want to be the test case have at it.
--- End quote ---
This blanket city code no longer stands in regards to CC after the legislature passed the statute that Dan W is referring to. So in reference to CC, your point is like a cow's opinion, it doesn't matter (moot).
Fly
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version