General Categories > Carry Issues

Farmer's Market Carry

<< < (7/7)

GreggL:

This suggestion may need to be addressed in another part of the forum but, perhaps the legislation allowing the establishment of gun free zones could be amended to require the venue to provide adequate (armed?) Security or an insurance rider to cover loss or damages to individuals in the event of an attack while on their premises. If they wish to disarm people then they should be legally and financially responsible should something occur.

Gunscribe:

--- Quote from: rudy on July 02, 2015, 11:54:04 AM ---I think it is interesting that the city "has the authority" to post public property.
--- End quote ---

By law they DO NOT have the authority to public property. Article 1 of the State Constitution affirms the neither the state nor any political subdivision deny or infringe the Right to keep and bear arms. They pass these laws knowing they are unconstitutional because they know that 99.9% of the population can not afford to challenge the law in court.

For political subdivisions to claim the section of the CCW law that allows for the posting of property gives them license to do so is a bogus claim. The section in the ccw law refers to private property. The CCW statute does NOT trump a constitutional command.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page