General Categories > Carry Issues

Alamo Drafthouse Cinema

<< < (4/5) > >>

Dan W:
 
Why ask? To generate discussion of the 51% rule. 
 

OnTheFly:

--- Quote from: Dan W on August 10, 2015, 10:37:24 PM ---
Why ask? To generate discussion of the 51% rule. 
 

--- End quote ---

Understood, discussion is good/informative. Though this can be done without business specific information. As they say, ignorance is bliss, or at least in this case ignorance is a potential defense in charges related to carrying in a prohibited place.

Fly

bullit:

--- Quote from: OnTheFly on August 10, 2015, 10:56:12 PM ---or at least in this case ignorance is a potential defense in charges related to carrying in a prohibited place.
--- End quote ---

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignorantia_juris_non_excusat

GreyGeek:

--- Quote from: bullit on August 11, 2015, 06:43:14 AM ---https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ignorantia_juris_non_excusat


--- End quote ---

It should be for the following reasons:
http://lawcomic.net/guide/?p=1031

Just like the percentage of income attributed to the sale of alcohol cannot be factually known unless the owner posts his financials on the door (thus making a "no guns" sign his easy way out - by design of the drafters of the legislation no doubt), it is not possible to know all the laws which carry financial or prison punishments.  How many people know that picking up a feather off the ground makes them liable for heavy fines and prison time IF.the feather is from a protected species?

RLMoeller:
The owner, Tyler J. Calabrese, tells me that revenue projections for alcohol are maybe 22%.

Now we know.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page