General Categories > Laws and Legislation

Gun Free Zone bill to be introduced by Sen Garrett!!!

<< < (2/4) > >>

depserv:
I can think of three reasons it won't pass:

1. Ernie Chambers and his comrades don't want it.
2. Ernie Chambers, his comrades, and their PR team the liberal press would rather see innocent people die than see liberal bigotry rolled back even just a little tiny bit.
3. Ernie Chambers and his comrades are not affected by truth and reason any more than they are affected by the law they swore an oath to obey.
 
(This is part of that oath, which I think they should be reminded of):
"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the constitution of the United States, and the constitution of the State of Nebraska, and will faithfully discharge the duties of ..."

This is the preamble to our state Constitution:
"All persons are by nature free and independent, and have certain inherent and inalienable rights; among these are life, liberty, the pursuit of happiness, and the right to keep and bear arms for security or defense of self, family, home, and others, and for lawful common defense, hunting, recreational use, and all other lawful purposes, and such rights shall not be denied or infringed by the state or any subdivision thereof. To secure these rights, and the protection of property, governments are instituted among people, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed."  (emphasis mine)

We all know what the U.S. Constitution says about the matter.

Both the federal and state constitutions are crystal clear in their guarantee of a right of the people to keep AND BEAR arms.  Those who deliberately infringe on that right are in violation of those laws, and therefore have no legal authority; all they have is power.  When they deliberately break the law they swore an oath to uphold, they become nothing more than a criminal gang, and they belong in jail with the rest of the criminals.  The problem, of course, is the criminal gang holds too much power to be brought to justice.  For the time being anyway.  But if loyal Americans ever do come to power, I'd like to see those criminals brought to justice.  And that applies especially to those whose hands are filthy with the blood of the victims they disarmed.   

This bill, as with others like it, will be a good loyalty test for members of the legislature, showing whether their loyalty is to the Constitution they swore an oath to uphold, or to the liberal cult so many of them grovel before.  It will show whether they think of bearing arms as a right or a privilege.  It will show whether they base what they do as legislators in truth or untruth, since gun control can not be justified without lies.  And it will show whether they are law-abiding citizens or part of a criminal gang.

Kendahl:

--- Quote from: depserv on October 17, 2015, 05:58:29 PM ---I can think of three reasons it won't pass:

1. Ernie Chambers ....
2. Ernie Chambers ....
3. Ernie Chambers ....
--- End quote ---

Ernie Chambers was on the judiciary committee when the concealed carry bill was passed 9 years ago. I can't remember whether he was in or out when state preemption was strengthened. That says he isn't all powerful. The divide on guns is usually between rural and urban senators with the rural ones on our side. It's encouraging that this bill comes from an urban senator. We shouldn't quit trying.

minnowmaker:
I need some clarification, I know churches are "gun free zones" but was under the impression that it was ok to carry if it was allowed with the Pastors knowledge and permission.  Can someone show me where that is written in the law?

Mali:

--- Quote from: minnowmaker on November 10, 2015, 02:59:16 PM ---I need some clarification, I know churches are "gun free zones" but was under the impression that it was ok to carry if it was allowed with the Pastors knowledge and permission.  Can someone show me where that is written in the law?

--- End quote ---
The law specifies that you have to be designated as a member of the security personnel for the church and the church would have to give written notice of the decision to arm the security personnel.

The specific area in the law would be Section 018.03.

Sandhillian:

--- Quote from: Mali on November 10, 2015, 03:18:48 PM ---The specific area in the law would be Section 018.03.
--- End quote ---

Mali is pointing to the State Patrol's Rules and Regulations.  The authority for the NSP to issue those comes from statute.  In this case, sec. 69-2441(1)(c).

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page