Author Topic: Action Needed: State Wide Preemption - LB289 (Read 16905 times)

whatsit · « **Reply #80 on:** January 23, 2016, 10:09:10 AM »

Quote from: depserv on January 23, 2016, 07:44:08 AM

Here's an NRA article on this bill:
https://www.nraila.org/articles/20160122/nebraska-state-preemption-bill-expected-for-first-floor-debate-and-vote

My state senator, Kathy Campbell, has refused to answer my requests to tell me where she stands on this bill. I'd say her cowardly silence speaks for itself.

Yep she's mine too. I called and asked that she call me back to discuss it and so far, nothing.

RLMoeller · « **Reply #81 on:** January 23, 2016, 11:00:38 AM »

I need 4 volunteers to assist with LB289 on Monday, for about 6 hours (or even 3), in Omaha. I'll provide lunch. Contact me directly for details.

DanClrk51 · « **Reply #82 on:** January 23, 2016, 01:33:57 PM »

Quote from: RLMoeller on January 23, 2016, 11:00:38 AM

I need 4 volunteers to assist with LB289 on Monday, for about 6 hours (or even 3), in Omaha. I'll provide lunch. Contact me directly for details.

What's the time frame you are looking for on Monday? From when to when presumably?

RLMoeller · « **Reply #83 on:** January 23, 2016, 02:30:36 PM »

9 - 3

DanClrk51 · « **Reply #84 on:** January 23, 2016, 05:15:06 PM »

Quote from: RLMoeller on January 23, 2016, 02:30:36 PM

9 - 3

I hope you can find your volunteers. Unfortunately, I'm working the bulk of that time.

Wymore Wrangler · « **Reply #85 on:** January 24, 2016, 11:52:20 AM »

I sent you a PM, but I thought it was in Lincoln not Omaha...

RLMoeller · « **Reply #86 on:** January 24, 2016, 01:10:50 PM »

I'll call you here in a few minutes. We need people at the Capitol in Lincoln, yes. I have a need for a couple volunteers in Omaha for something too.

RLMoeller · « **Reply #87 on:** January 24, 2016, 01:41:49 PM »

Be sure to like the NFOA Facebook page if you use Facebook and haven't already.

https://www.facebook.com/NebraskaFirearmsOwnersAssociation

I will be doing a live update from the Capitol tomorrow.

m morton · « **Reply #88 on:** January 24, 2016, 01:46:42 PM »

what ya need done in omaha ?

RLMoeller · « **Reply #89 on:** January 24, 2016, 02:22:40 PM »

have an opportunity to do pass through calls and will cost almost nothing if we staff with volunteers. The call center is in Omaha

Pass through calls are when you tell someone the key points and ask if they would like to talk to their senators office. Hit the button and the call gets transferred. Not robo calls, live person talking to registered voters.

RLMoeller · « **Reply #90 on:** January 24, 2016, 09:01:36 PM »

OK, tomorrow is the big day. Anyone that can come to Lincoln and watch is welcome (and encouraged) to come on down. The General Session starts at 10am.

Also, I wanted to share the key points I'm pushing on the senators, which may help as you make calls and write emails (or visit in person before the general session tomorrow morning).

What LB289 does:

- Provides for a State-Wide standard regarding Gun Ownership.

- Reaffirms that the Nebraska Legislature is the body that sets restrictions on firearms ownership.

- Sends a clear message that cities may not exceed the authority the state has provided.

- Would eliminate the unconstitutional ordinances in Lincoln and Omaha that restrict ownership, in excess of State law.

What LB289 DOES NOT do:

- Does not affect the ability to regulate the discharge of firearms within city limits.

- Does not affect the zoning abilities of cities and regulation of firearms related businesses.

- Does not prevent cities from posted city buildings as Gun Free Zones.

What a vote against LB289 does:

- Is a vote against Article 1 of the Nebraska Constitution.

- Forfeits the role of the legislature in providing certain authorities to cities.

What a vote to recommit does:

- Kills the bill.

- Will be viewed as a vote against the bill.

It is important to note that Statewide Preemption exists today for Concealed Carry Permit holders. Equality under the law principles should apply to all gun owners.

RLMoeller · « **Reply #91 on:** January 24, 2016, 09:03:19 PM »

Lincoln Mayor Beutler and the Lincoln Police chief seem to be getting a lot of senators to waver on this because of their "concerns", which mostly consist of inaccurate fear based b.s. Oddly, much like we are seeing coming from the Bloomberg funded group.

Wymore Wrangler · « **Reply #92 on:** January 24, 2016, 09:33:40 PM »

My email and response from Senator Baker R-30...

Skip,

I continue to support 2nd amendment rights.
On Jan 24, 2016 1:04 PM, "Skip McPheron" <hm91754@hotmail.com> wrote:

Senator Baker, I'm and calling on you to keep the promise you made to me on my front porch to support the 2nd Amendment and the Nebraska Constitution. LB-289 supports both of them, and keeps liberal anti-gunners from creating Catch-22 laws to trip up people lawfully exercising their God given rights... Senator Chambers in his continued tantrum filled agenda against law abiding citizens is trying to kill this bill with the recommit vote because he isn't sure he can bully his way to a filibuster. Nebraskan need to cut down these antics so we can pass need legislation so that we remain viable in attracting new commerce to the State... Thank you again for you attention to this vital piece of legislation that is good for all Nebraskans...

RANGER 01 · « **Reply #93 on:** January 26, 2016, 12:22:41 AM »

I emailed my Sen. Roy Baker District 30 but never go a email back. I also called and a woman answered and I told her I hoped Mr. Baker would support LB 289 and she said that he was going to support LB 289, we shall have to see if he does.
Dick

gsd · « **Reply #94 on:** January 26, 2016, 06:41:39 AM »

Matt Hansen couldn't even bring himself to respond to my email. Apparently my response from the last round must have insulted him. Can't understand why, all I did was tell him if he didn't honor the Will of the People he was elected to represent, I'd find someone who would...

RLMoeller · « **Reply #95 on:** January 26, 2016, 07:49:32 AM »

Our primary target today is Senator Morfeld. Press him to articulate what specific Lincoln ordinances that restrict ownership does he believe are just. Ask him what they are. I don't believe he knows. I don't think they understand which restrictions are duplication of state law and which are specific to Licoln (or Omaha). If we can educate Morfeld we have made huge progress.

f1fanatic · « **Reply #96 on:** January 26, 2016, 07:58:04 AM »

No response from the office of Kate Bolz(29). Color me surprised.

Mali · « **Reply #97 on:** January 26, 2016, 08:08:05 AM »

Response from Murante:

Quote

Thank you for your email on LB 289. I support LB 289 and am a strong advocate for the 2nd amendment. I will work with Senator Ebke to ensure that the bill is passed into law.

Again, thank you for your email. Please feel free to contact me on any other issues facing the Legislature.

Sincerely,
John Murante
State Senator
District 49

ILoveCats · « **Reply #98 on:** January 26, 2016, 08:31:43 AM »

Quote from: f1fanatic on January 26, 2016, 07:58:04 AM

No response from the office of Kate Bolz(29). Color me surprised.

Keep working on it. I've spoken to her a couple times, exchanged e=mails and spoken with her staffer. She was, initially, very clearly in favor.

Now that the whole issue is getting bogged down with rhetoric about robocalls during the football game, and carve-outs for city parks, etc., it's all getting muddled.

NE Bull · « **Reply #99 on:** January 26, 2016, 09:12:47 AM »

Quote from: RLMoeller on January 26, 2016, 07:49:32 AM

Our primary target today is Senator Morfeld. Press him to articulate what specific Lincoln ordinances that restrict ownership does he believe are just. Ask him what they are. I don't believe he knows. I don't think they understand which restrictions are duplication of state law and which are specific to Licoln (or Omaha). If we can educate Morfeld we have made huge progress.

Here are my thoughts concerning Lincoln's ownership restrictions. When you read down thru the list, most sound , on the surface, "reasonable" even- assault/ domestic, DUI, concealed weapon, etc, etc. are mere misdemeanors and many of these are nothing more than a "don't do it again" and a fine. No harm no foul- collect a few bucks for the court. (such as in Kevin William's case- simple fine) life goes on.
My take is that if these folks were actually a possible menace to society, then a heftier sentence, including jail time and rehabilitation would have been appropriate- ie- felony- which then puts them under federal/ state law as a prohibited person.
Just my take on things

I actually spoke to quite a few folks at the fair last summer, that by Lincoln laws, were barred from owning a gun for various things that happen in life. A couple guys had gotten caught up in a bar brawl- everyone got assault charges (of some sort)- now barred for 10 years IN Lincoln. At least another couple fellas were barred due to
'Domestic Assault' for what was no more than pushing past their significant other to leave the house/ room during an argument. She called po po first- he's without rights IN LINCOLN for at least 10 years.
The list goes on and on. These are the kinds of stories our Senators need to hear. These unconstitutional laws have overreaching unintended consequences and are not needed.