General Categories > Newsworthy

2nd Amendment suit filed, Hebron Newspaper 04 Nov 2015 very biased

<< < (6/6)

Thump:

--- Quote from: tstuart34 on November 23, 2015, 12:32:26 PM ---I do not see this as a 2A sounds like these people are full of bs and looking to fight. (all parties involved). They did something to get a protection order and there for he can not own guns.

They all need to find a new hobby of not starting rifts.
--- End quote ---

You're partially correct. There is some BS here, however, it's NOT with this guy. Is it your position that if one is being encroached upon and if he pushes back, he's looking for a fight? If this is your position then you might consider on adjustment. There's not many MEN today who are willing to Call it like they see it, He does. Black is black white is white and bullbutter is flat out bullbutter. He'll call it. Deal with it.

Real simple, He was asked by some to get on the council, He signed an affidavit with another guy in August of 2014 to be a write in candidate, He knew he wasn't going to win a position due to the caustic family togetherness. That's when the fun began, his property was more than a few times riddled with debris, flyers with his picture were passed out all over town with the Heading. " You should know your candidates " ...let's see this was slander, defamation of character and Yes Libel. Legal's on it. Then the harassment orders from a resident who's 71 and best friends with the council chair and head of the community club on the 15th of Oct 2014, then on the 16th two more women, a neighbor of the council chairman, approxiomately 40 whom he's filed suit against for remodeling work done in 2013, the Council chairman's sister also, an easy 85 years old. It was curious that all three of these females were in the court house the same time on the 16th when the two later females filed harassment orders. Of course the first petitioner had to be there to provide transportation for the 85 year old. Many can see conspiracy here, it's clear.

By the way the attorney destroyed the claims of the petitioners. There were several in court, But interestingly enough the judge, who seems to be a clear man hater, and who has little respect for by any attorney who has gone before her allowed the harassment orders to stand. Situations like this is where the judicial system is a joke....... It's NOT about Common Law.... It's not about Equity Law.... it's simply Just-US.

Just to let you know, there are several attorneys in this district who will not even consider taking a case to go before this judge, because she's irrational and unreasonable and clearly biased to many.

tstuart34:

--- Quote from: Thump on November 24, 2015, 09:00:01 AM ---You're partially correct. There is some BS here, however, it's NOT with this guy. Is it your position that if one is being encroached upon and if he pushes back, he's looking for a fight? If this is your position then you might consider on adjustment. There's not many MEN today who are willing to Call it like they see it, He does. Black is black white is white and bullbutter is flat out bullbutter. He'll call it. Deal with it.

Real simple, He was asked by some to get on the council, He signed an affidavit with another guy in August of 2014 to be a write in candidate, He knew he wasn't going to win a position due to the caustic family togetherness. That's when the fun began, his property was more than a few times riddled with debris, flyers with his picture were passed out all over town with the Heading. " You should know your candidates " ...let's see this was slander, defamation of character and Yes Libel. Legal's on it. Then the harassment orders from a resident who's 71 and best friends with the council chair and head of the community club on the 15th of Oct 2014, then on the 16th two more women, a neighbor of the council chairman, approxiomately 40 whom he's filed suit against for remodeling work done in 2013, the Council chairman's sister also, an easy 85 years old. It was curious that all three of these females were in the court house the same time on the 16th when the two later females filed harassment orders. Of course the first petitioner had to be there to provide transportation for the 85 year old. Many can see conspiracy here, it's clear.

By the way the attorney destroyed the claims of the petitioners. There were several in court, But interestingly enough the judge, who seems to be a clear man hater, and who has little respect for by any attorney who has gone before her allowed the harassment orders to stand. Situations like this is where the judicial system is a joke....... It's NOT about Common Law.... It's not about Equity Law.... it's simply Just-US.

Just to let you know, there are several attorneys in this district who will not even consider taking a case to go before this judge, because she's irrational and unreasonable and clearly biased to many.

--- End quote ---
This is getting juicy.



What is your source on this matter? You have sooooo many detail beyond what has been wrote.





Sent from my VS985 4G using Tapatalk

Thump:

--- Quote from: tstuart34 on November 24, 2015, 09:23:35 AM ---This is getting juicy. What is your source on this matter? You have sooooo many detail beyond what has been wrote.
--- End quote ---


Uhhhh I live in the area and know many of the players.... beside the fact that a lot of this is video of council meetings ONLINE!! It's not rocket science. I mean even Nebraskan's should be able to see what's going on, if the heads not up and locked.   ;)

NE Bull:
Rick has been in contact with myself and the BoD for quite some time.  I have been following/ monitoring the ordeal for some time now, waiting for Mr. Laughinghouse to post his story here.
I'd have to go back thru my notes, but I believe the 2A concern here is that was asked/told to hand over all firearms although there was seemingly no crime committed that required confiscation. 

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page