General Categories > Carry Issues
Over 50% of income from alcohol sales
RobertH:
I hear ya Erock. how can we tell how much food or booze a local establishment sells? plus, is the 50% over a day, month, year, lifetime? its quite vague. and so is the signage requirement.
Erock, make sure to get set up for a Full Member. you can read, discuss and vote on how the NFOA will testify on the upcoming committee bills. and tell your friends/family/coworkers to get involved. spreading the word and being active is the start to make some real changes.
m morton:
i use this as my rule... if the place has "bar"& grill in the name i don't carry or a bar that server just fried foods no real menu . if it's a sit down place to eat and serves booze too then i enter ...
depserv:
Does anyone know if there have been any prosecutions from this edict? I don't know much about bookkeeping, so maybe someone can tell me how easy it would be to establish that a place gets 50% of its income from booze or only 49%? Could it vary maybe from one day to another, or one season to another? And is it net or gross income? My guess is if you go in and eat a steak and don't create a disturbance and your gun is well concealed you won't have a problem. But as the saying goes, **** happens. So this law should not be on the books, and clearly was put there by liberal bigots looking for any excuse to harass those who choose to be armed. But compared to other illegal edicts imposed by traitors, this is one of the smaller ones.
ILoveCats:
--- Quote from: depserv on February 21, 2016, 09:15:09 AM ---Does anyone know if there have been any prosecutions from this edict?
...
But compared to other illegal edicts imposed by traitors, this is one of the smaller ones.
--- End quote ---
Yep. I'm kind of thinking in the grand scheme of "priorities", this is not a high one. If anyone is aware of one prosecution -- let alone many -- I'd be interested to hear about it.
Given our legislature we could easily have ended up with something that forbade carry in any estabishment that sells any alcohol at all, even it's 1% of sales. You know... "for the sake of children's safety, and to keep our law enforcement officers out of harm's way, and in the interest of abused spouses, and to prevent cruelty to puppies," and all that sort of thing.
depserv:
--- Quote from: feralcatkillr on February 21, 2016, 01:58:52 PM ---Yep. I'm kind of thinking in the grand scheme of "priorities", this is not a high one. If anyone is aware of one prosecution -- let alone many -- I'd be interested to hear about it.
Given our legislature we could easily have ended up with something that forbade carry in any estabishment that sells any alcohol at all, even it's 1% of sales. You know... "for the sake of children's safety, and to keep our law enforcement officers out of harm's way, and in the interest of abused spouses, and to prevent cruelty to puppies," and all that sort of thing.
--- End quote ---
Anyone who is opposed to gun control is engaged in a war on women (even though men were calling guns equalizers before the word feminist even existed). And he hates puppies.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version