General Categories > Carry Issues

Lb 1033

<< < (2/2)

Chris Z:

--- Quote from: DanClrk51 on March 03, 2010, 01:29:35 AM ---I don't see why Christensen doesn't just file LB 1033 to LB 817. That way circumventing the idiots on the judiciary committee and letting it get a full vote on the floor.

--- End quote ---

To make a long story short.... Senator Christensen is facing a tough re-election bid this year. He has other pressing issues in his district that he has to put some focus on. Forcing 1033 on top of 817 could burn some bridges he has built on other bills.

That is how the Legislature works unfortunately. Sometimes some things are easier said than done.

DanClrk51:
I see. I hope his constituents recognize his value and re-elect him.

resqem:
Well I hate to have to go register just because they missed a word in the first bill.  But I also don't want to be arrested since I go in and out of Omaha every day.  Any other suggestions?

DanClrk51:
Well for me I already went and registered my three carry pistols with Omaha even though I am a Bellevue resident. I did this in August of 2008 so a year before LB 430. However I do think that the language in LB 430 was pretty clear that registration of the gun carried concealed by people with CHP is exempt from local regulation regarding transportation and ownership. Like Chris said it would have to take a real case to get Omaha to comply.

What I would like to know is: Has anyone outside of Omaha with a CHP been pulled over in Omaha yet? Please let us know. I would like to know if the officer would have even bothered to ask for a registration card when already having seen the CHP.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page