General Categories > Laws and Legislation

Bret Lindstrom

<< < (3/8) > >>

GreyGeek:

--- Quote from: omaharj on April 05, 2022, 09:03:48 AM ---https://www.nrapvf.org/grades/nebraska/
Still looks like Lindstrom is the best "viable" candidate.
Although I wish someone from the board would ask him why he's pretty quiet about LB773

--- End quote ---

"Viable" is such a flexible word, full of meaning and hope.  But, what has he done so far?  Bullit has listed some pretty damning reasons not to vote for him:

--- Quote ---He did vote to repeal the Death Penalty and increase taxes ... and overrode the Governor's vetoes of both.  Also, has voted against "Voter ID".
--- End quote ---
Do you really want to vote for someone who thinks that taxes are too low, who wants to take the death penalty off the list of deterrent punishments, and, is against voter id?  Here are at least 24 things one needs a valid ID to do, but it is too hard for someone to get a voter ID?  That's laughable.
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/24-things-that-require-a-photo-id
And, considering all the fraud that occurred with the  "mail-in" voting in Nov of 2020 one would have to be a Democrat or a Marxist, but I repeat myself,  not to support voter id in future elections.

omaharj:
Okay, I'm now uncomfortable with my choice. He DID vote for LB773, but his relationship with BRAD ASHFORD is upsetting. I feel BA is the biggest opponent the NFOA has ever had.
 Who do YOU think should get my vote. My overriding issue is the 2nd Amendment. I'm basically a one issue voter on the Gov race.

Opusnbill7:
Pillen seems to be the only candidate left then based on your statement omaharj.

While the timing is suspect of the allegations becoming public, with witnesses on the record, it's hard to vote for Herbster if you respect women's agency over their own bodies.

Honestly, they all suck, but you have to hold your nose and vote for someone...

SemperFiGuy:
Looks like an early "October Surprise" number on Chuck Herbster.   Looks like they are moving them up to springtime these days.

IF we draw a line through the name of every eligible man who has ever offended a woman or carried on an affair, we will be working with a very shrunken candidates list.  I'm not making excuses here a-tall....Just being open, candid, and realistic about human nature.  Read the backstories on just about all of our own presidents, for example.  And then, there are senators, representatives, judges, mayors............................

And executives, scientists, statesmen........

Oh....I forgot preachers, pastors, rabbis, priests, all the moral arbiters.

Lord Nelson would never have been allowed to fight the Battle of Trafalgar.......There was that Lady Hamilton affair, y'know.  Such an outrage against purity.

Opusnbill7:
We're talking about a little more than "offending a woman" here.  Offending is ok.  Groping is not.  If he touched their shoulder without permission that's one thing, but putting your hand up someone's dress is entirely another.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page