< Back to the Main Site

Author Topic: Customer Shoots Robber in Drug Store???  (Read 12318 times)

Offline JimP

  • Steel Benefactor
  • *
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 1310
Re: Customer Shoots Robber in Drug Store???
« Reply #100 on: May 10, 2010, 08:04:56 AM »
Quote
"He was able to produce it fairly quickly, and knew right where it was, so it was obviously in a place where normal movements would have exposed it," Conboy said. "And if that's the case, we can't go forward."

So ...... practice your drawstroke and you are not concealing?

Ummmm..... this seems like it was a polititical decision: If Conboy brought charges, the public outrage would crush him and his political cronies.

Just because it ended like we want it to does not mean it was done right.
The Right to Keep and BEAR Arms is enshrined explicitly in both our State and Federal Constitutions, yet most of us are afraid to actually excercise that Right, for very good reason: there is a good chance of being arrested........ and  THAT is a damned shame.  III.

Offline FarmerRick

  • NFOA Co-Founder
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Location: Valley, NE
  • Posts: 3250
  • Antagonist of liberals, anti-hunters & hoplophobes
Re: Customer Shoots Robber in Drug Store???
« Reply #101 on: May 10, 2010, 09:54:07 AM »
wonder if / when they'll give him back his old gun!?!?!

I've always wondered how that worked.  Anybody have any insight?

I'm sure it will be used as evidence in the case against the other two thugs involved in the robbery.  Because of the "speediness"  ::) of the court system in Omaha, that trial most likely won't happen for a year or so.

James will be lucky to ever see it again.
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

Offline bkoenig

  • Gun Show Volunteer
  • Powder Benefactor
  • *
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Location: Lincoln, NE
  • Posts: 3677
  • Aspiring cranky old gun nut
Re: Customer Shoots Robber in Drug Store???
« Reply #102 on: May 10, 2010, 11:27:49 AM »
Sounds to me there needs to be a law requiring immediate restoration of personal property seized by law enforcement if no charges are filed.

Offline 20nickels

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Location: G.I.
  • Posts: 177
  • I've got your back
Re: Customer Shoots Robber in Drug Store???
« Reply #103 on: May 10, 2010, 06:02:29 PM »
Sounds to me there needs to be a law requiring immediate restoration of personal property seized by law enforcement if no charges are filed.
Agreed, once the ballistics testing is done there is no reason that I know of to keep it.
~1522~    In an effort to reduce the continuing fear surrounding the black magic of guns and black powder, a Bavarian necromancer states that rifles are more accurate than smoothbores because the spinning bullet doesn't allow a demon to gain purchase upon it.

Offline Dan W

  • NFOA Co-Founder
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Location: Lincoln NE
  • Posts: 8143
Re: Customer Shoots Robber in Drug Store???
« Reply #104 on: May 10, 2010, 07:57:28 PM »
Quote
"He was able to produce it fairly quickly, and knew right where it was, so it was obviously in a place where normal movements would have exposed it," Conboy said. "And if that's the case, we can't go forward."

So ...... practice your drawstroke and you are not concealing?

Ummmm..... this seems like it was a polititical decision: If Conboy brought charges, the public outrage would crush him and his political cronies.

Just because it ended like we want it to does not mean it was done right.

Doesn't mean it was done wrong either. No evidence to prove the charges, no witnesses that would testify as to the visibility of the firearm.

Innocent until proven guilty...No?
Dan W    NFOA Co Founder
Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom.   J. F. K.

Offline Wesley D

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Location: Nebraska
  • Posts: 1096
  • Rifleman
Re: Customer Shoots Robber in Drug Store???
« Reply #105 on: May 10, 2010, 08:38:37 PM »
Innocent until proven guilty...No?

Wait.  We still do that?   ::)

And regarding the return of his M&P... I can understand OPD's retention of the shotgun because it was used in the crime the two gang members are being accused of.  But James' handgun wasn't used to commit a crime.   I have to wonder if there is any other form of (legal) private property that the OPD would retain for a potentially indefinite period when not used to commit a crime?
"I will accept the rules that you feel necessary to your freedom. I am free, no matter what rules surround me. If I find them tolerable, I tolerate them; if I find them too obnoxious, I break them. I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do." -Robert Heinlein

Offline Chris Z

  • NFOA Co-Founder
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Location: Lincoln NE
  • Posts: 2496
    • Nebraska Concealed Carry Training
Re: Customer Shoots Robber in Drug Store???
« Reply #106 on: May 10, 2010, 08:43:16 PM »
The M&P has to be held for the trial's of the robbers...... Don't know why, doesn't make sense, but that is our justice system.


Offline Husker_Fan

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Location: Omaha
  • Posts: 717
Re: Customer Shoots Robber in Drug Store???
« Reply #107 on: May 11, 2010, 08:41:22 AM »
It sounds wierd that his gun has to be held for the robbers' trial, but the surviving robbers can be charged differently, or subjected to a higher sentence because someone died as a result of the robbery.  This can be true even if the felony murder statute in Nebraksa doesn't apply (I don't know if it does).  The county attorney needs the gun because it is evidence about the death of one of the suspects and he can use that evidence to pursue aggravated charges.

Offline Ronvandyn

  • Pollywog
  • Powder Benefactor
  • *
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Location: Bellevue NE
  • Posts: 561
Re: Customer Shoots Robber in Drug Store???
« Reply #108 on: May 12, 2010, 11:21:16 AM »
 
The M&P has to be held for the trial's of the robbers...... Don't know why, doesn't make sense, but that is our justice system.

I am undergoing something similar right now with my phone.  They have to keep it so that if the defense attorney wants his/her own experts to validate the states findings the items must be available for them in an unchanged condition.  Knowing how long these things take James may not see his weapon for at least a year, and quite possibly longer.  Its going to be 6 months before I get my Blackberry back.
NE-CHP Holder, USAF Veteran, NRA Member,  ENGC Member
KC0MXX

Offline Dtrain323i

  • Powder Benefactor
  • *
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 136
Re: Customer Shoots Robber in Drug Store???
« Reply #109 on: May 12, 2010, 02:11:44 PM »
The M&P has to be held for the trial's of the robbers...... Don't know why, doesn't make sense, but that is our justice system.



are the robbers being charged with their friend's murder? Thats how it worked back in IL. A couple years ago, a group of teenagers broke into a house. The person living there killed 1 of them. After the burglars were caught, they were charged with Burglary, B&E, and 2nd Degree Murder.