General Categories > Laws and Legislation

Another "What if....?"

<< < (7/7)

Dan W:

--- Quote from: Chris Z on June 12, 2010, 05:31:26 AM ---My point is simply that no matter what the law says, or doesn't say.... Sometimes it doesn't matter.

The above case is a perfect example of how OPD will go to any length to "make the arrest" when it comes to guns. Because they have to try so darn hard to "look like they are tough on guns".

--- End quote ---

Sorry my question was aimed at SFG. 

 

tut:
Hmmm, I mis-read LB 817.  Seems I read it as Omaha (or any city/town) is not to enforce any registration, period.  This would include CCW holders, it would include non-CCW holders, it would include Uncle Harry or Joe-what's-his-face purchasing a concealable weapon at Guns Unlimited whether or not holding a CCW boot-lick certificate.  No registration.  Period.

Anyone read it differently?  I ask this due to a post here stating that CCW holders would not be prosecuted for having unregistered weapons per LB 817.  ...I disagree there in that I read 817 as no registration, period.  Please enlighten me as my reading skills may not be what they once were.

Chris Z:
LB 817 ONLY exempts CHP holders


18-1703 Cities and villages shall not have the power
to regulate the ownership, possession, or transportation of a
concealed handgun, as such ownership, possession, or transportation
is authorized under the Concealed Handgun Permit Act, except as
expressly provided by state law, and shall not have the power
to require registration of a concealed handgun owned, possessed,
or transported by a permitholder under the act. Any existing
city or village ordinance, permit, or regulation regulating the
ownership, possession, or transportation of a concealed handgun,
as such ownership, possession, or transportation is authorized
under the act, except as expressly provided under state law, and
any existing city or village ordinance, permit, or regulation
requiring the registration of a concealed handgun owned, possessed,
or transported by a permitholder under the act, is declared to be
null and void as against any permitholder possessing a valid permit
under the act.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page