< Back to the Main Site

Author Topic: Castle Doctrine discussed  (Read 2702 times)

Offline Chris Z

  • NFOA Co-Founder
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Location: Lincoln NE
  • Posts: 2496
    • Nebraska Concealed Carry Training
Re: Castle Doctrine discussed
« Reply #20 on: November 30, 2010, 04:17:03 PM »
There is a "committee on committees" that handles it and the Senators vote

Offline DanClrk51

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Location: Bellevue
  • Posts: 1128
Re: Castle Doctrine discussed
« Reply #21 on: November 30, 2010, 06:46:44 PM »
Great......so there's a chance for the anti's to get another seat on the committee.

A-FIXER

  • Guest
Re: Castle Doctrine discussed
« Reply #22 on: November 30, 2010, 06:50:42 PM »
There is a "committee on committees" that handles it and the Senators vote
and this is how you know too much goverment is a bad thing.

Offline RLMoeller

  • Sponsor- NFOA Firearm Raffle at the 2009 Big Buck Classic. 2010 Firearm Rights Champion Award winner
  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2009
  • Location: La Vista, NE
  • Posts: 3058
Re: Castle Doctrine discussed
« Reply #23 on: November 30, 2010, 07:55:11 PM »
There is a "committee on committees" that handles it and the Senators vote
and this is how you know too much goverment is a bad thing.

amen

Offline RWNJ

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Feb 2010
  • Location: Omaha / Lincoln
  • Posts: 29
Re: Castle Doctrine discussed
« Reply #24 on: November 30, 2010, 10:03:09 PM »
Anti-freedom legislators always seek the Judiciary Committee as their priority.  It feeds their lust for power.
Cynical, opinionated, and far to the right of conservative.