General Categories > Laws and Legislation
2011 Legislative issues
shaggy853:
I wont disagree that the penalty is too harsh for the offense, but the rights of the property owner come before the permit holder.
justsomeguy:
I concede the point to Mr. Jesse T.
Good argument sir.
I was just thinking that it was one way or the other but just removing the provision from the CHP law preserves the rights of the property owner while eliminating additional unnecessary penalties for the gun owner.
bkoenig:
It's not a huge priority, but I would personally like to see the fees for CCW permits come down. It's bad enough that we have to pay to exercise a right, but for someone with a low income the cost can be downright prohibitive.
Wymore Wrangler:
I was a State employee until last July working at BSDC. When they opened up the campus to the public, I asked the Human Resources Manager about the CCW law. She took the issue up to the HHS attorneys and they agreed that the State couldn't prevent CCW holders from having properly stowed pistol in their vehicle.... But then she told me "please don't tell any other employees"...LOL
Husker_Fan:
I agree with Jesse and have said it on here before. Private property owners have the right to deny entry to their property or ask someone to leave. I think the rules should be the same across the board and you are presumed welcome on private property that is open to the public until you are asked to leave. If you refuse, you are trespassing. Heck, I'd be OK with a law that says you are trespassing if you enter conspicuously marked property and doesn't require that you be asked to leave.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version