General Categories > Carry Issues
Gun Free Zone?
Dan W:
From LB430
(2) If a person, persons, entity, or entities in control
of the property or an employer in control of the property prohibits
a permitholder from carrying a concealed handgun into or onto the
place or premises and such place or premises are open to the
public, a permitholder does not violate this section unless the
person, persons, entity, or entities in control of the property
or employer in control of the property has posted conspicuous
notice that carrying a concealed handgun is prohibited in or
on the place or premises or has made a request, directly or
through an authorized representative or management personnel, that
the permitholder remove the concealed handgun from the place or
premises. A permitholder carrying a concealed handgun in a vehicle
into or onto any place or premises does not violate this section
so long as the handgun is not removed from the vehicle while the
vehicle is in or on the place or premises.
(3) A permitholder carrying a concealed handgun in a
vehicle or on his or her person while riding in or on a vehicle
into or onto any parking area, which is open 1 to the public, used by
any location listed in subdivision (1)(a) of this section, does not
violate this section if, prior to exiting the vehicle, the handgun
is locked inside the glove box, trunk, or other compartment of the
vehicle, a storage box securely attached to the vehicle, or, if the
vehicle is a motorcycle, a hardened compartment securely attached
to the motorcycle. This subsection does not apply to any parking
area used by such location when the carrying of a concealed handgun
into or onto such parking area is prohibited by federal law.
OnTheFly:
--- Quote from: Randy ---By not pointing out meaning to the store management and or corporation.
The sign may have been removed by the management.
Emails to corporate could just get that location in trouble.
The date of the email is relevant as to when the signage was reported missing.
--- End quote ---
Oh! I'm with you now. No. I didn't point out where it was NOT posted. Only commented on the fact that it WAS posted at the Val's To Go at 70th & Vine.
Fly
bullit:
Thanks Dan.
Randy:
LB430 Page 18-19
Sec. 5. Cities and villages shall not have the power to regulate the ownership, possession, or transportation of a concealed handgun, as such ownership, possession, or transportation is authorized under the Concealed Handgun Permit Act, except as expressly provided by state law. Any existing city or village ordinance, permit, or regulation regulating the ownership, possession, or transportation of a concealed handgun, as such ownership, possession, or transportation is authorized under the act, is declared to be null and void as against any permitholder
possessing a valid permit under the act.
018.01O Any place or premises or employer owned vehicle where those
in control of the place, premises or vehicle have prohibited permit holders from carrying concealed handguns;
As written those in control being the city can still post any city property including parks?
Bummer I did not realize this, the wording is sneaky. I had interpreted LB430 to give exemption to those cities posted park areas. realizing that there are also federal gun free zones such as schools.
Dan perhaps I missed it but has anyone confirmed this with the AG?
Thomas:
Good Question. I live by a park and the city is not in control of that property.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version