General Categories > Laws and Legislation
North Platte city parks and Ord. 93.05
HuskerXDM:
--- Quote from: Dan W on June 23, 2012, 02:49:21 PM ---I think the question here boils down to this.
Are city streets and sidewalks fundamentally different from a park, in that a political subdivision could ban valid CHP holders from carrying in one place, while at the same time being prevented from doing so in the other.
I think that these examples are fundamentally the same, and therefore a city can not ban legal concealed carry in a park any more than they can ban CCW with a valid permit on the sidewalks or streets or any other public areas that are not included in the list of banned places that the state law mandates.
--- End quote ---
If this was Facebook... I would "like" this comment.
Husker_Fan:
Plus, the statute lists a bunch of places that are owned by a political subdivision and are off limits. Places like courthouses and board/council meetings. Parks are not listed, and the statute doesn't let a political subdivision post anywhere else. That's my take at least.
I know it's the subject of questions be passed on to the AG. I hope we're making progress there.
DaveB:
Good job Chuck! It appears that the gun owners have been heard in NP.
Chuck Matson:
Positive discussion about our cause on am radio program, mugs in the morning today. Possible this will come to a vote July 3rd. Will keep everyone apprised as things progress. Thanks
Chuck Matson:
Very good comment at online NP Bulletin. Try to find a editor that is as open minded as George Lauby. Absolutely blown away.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version