General Categories > Laws and Legislation
Here it is:
Ronvandyn:
I dont really see much difference between this proposal and the one in 1994. What is a "Military Characteristic"? Anything she chooses it to be? All guns have "Military Characteristic"s dont they? And are there not more than 900 different types of firearms already sold in this country? Is she actually wanting to list the one's that are "Government Approved"?
Does she realize that smoking crack is illegal? Maybe she should lay off the stuff.
Ron
instag8tr:
I dont know about the rest of you but i am not registering ****
Dan W:
--- Quote from: Ronvandyn on December 27, 2012, 03:30:47 PM ---I dont really see much difference between this proposal and the one in 1994.
--- End quote ---
Are you F'in joking?? NFA registration of all semi auto firearms capable of holding more than 10 rounds is absolute tyranny, not to mention the total ban on millions of existing magazines over 10 rounds
skydve76:
Wow Dan you sure feel strongly about this one! Good for you. When you say total ban of the mags, does that also ban existing mags?
Can someone tell me, during the last ban, was transfer also banned or is that a new thing in the new proposed ban? Transfer I assume means you cannot even sell a banned gun, but if I remember you could sell banned before just could not manufacter them.
Sorry the ban was before my time in guns so I dont fully understand what I am looking at.
One thing I can tell you that banning something I own is equivalent to forcefully siezing property which is against the very grain, and original purpose, of the constitution.
instag8tr:
no the last one was just feel good cosmetic b.s. and yes they are talking about all current mags. F*c* you Feinstien
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version