General Categories > Laws and Legislation

Reply from Adrian Smith

(1/3) > >>

jimneb:
I just received this reply from Adrian Smith.

January 9, 2013

 

 

Dear Mr. jimneb:

 

Thank you for contacting me regarding gun control. I appreciate you taking the time to share your views on this matter.

 

The United States Constitution guarantees the right to keep and bear arms. Restricting laws for abiding citizens will not deter criminal behavior, and I remain concerned with the precedent measures such as assault weapons bans may set for future policy.

 

The safety of the American public, and in particular our children, is an issue I take very seriously. Rather than adopting proposals which would infringe on our Second Amendment rights, Congress must work to address underlying issues, such as the mental health of Americans, which may lead to violence in our communities.

 

As a life member of the National Rifle Association, I will work with my colleagues in the House of Representatives to protect our constitutional rights and oppose legislation which would restrict such rights. Rest assured I will keep your thoughts in mind as the legislative process continues.

 

Again, thank you for contacting me; please do so in the future if I may be of assistance.

Sincerely,

 

 
ADRIAN SMITH
Member of Congress   

 

A-FIXER:
Same one I also received.

gsd:
Verbatim? A canned response would be slightly disappointing.

CitizenClark:

--- Quote from: gsd on January 09, 2013, 09:22:39 AM ---Verbatim? A canned response would be slightly disappointing.

--- End quote ---

It is just a reality of constituent mail. Once the boss approves particular language, you stick with the wording he has approved. In this situation, where he is no doubt receiving dozens of letters focusing on the same core issue, one of his aides probably got a stack of letters on the firearms topic and wrote one general response to all of them.

m0par:
They all use canned responses on major issues. Staff just replies with pre-written response. Can you imagine the workload individual responses would create when dealing with the same issue over and over?

I don't think I've ever received anything but a canned response from a politician, written or email. Sometimes they aren't even related to the comment/request initially sent.

It's a helluva lot better than an intellectually dishonest canned response stating that "I believe we need to enact stricter gun control policies for the safety of our children."

ETA: Oops. CitizenClark beat me to it.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page