General Categories > Laws and Legislation

More double dealing by the NRA

(1/5) > >>

JimP:
http://thearmedschoolteacher.blogspot.com/2009/05/nra-playing-kill-bill-against.html

I could not remember the bill number for Asshford's "Too Dangerous For Civilian Use List"..... anybody else remember it?

Rich B:
I wouldn't consider that double-dealing and I can also see the NRA's point regarding preemption.

A neutral stance may have been more PC. 

00BUCK:
This is the kind of stuff that made me stop being an NRA member.

For the last 17 years or so they have been "Negotiating Rights Away"

huskergun:
00BUCK,
What about Heller?? I think the NRA fought hard for that and did what they were supposed to do.
Neutral stance would have been the more appropriate thing to do though.
 I don't think Charlston Heston was negotiating my rights away.
The NRA is the only pro Second Amendment group with any clout in this country. They must have the support of every gun owner in this country. Not every one can be happy with everything all the time..Right??
??? for you......Why do you think the NRA is so bad? Just curious.

Dan W:
Initially the NRA said that Heller was too big a gamble to take and even brought some lawsuits in an attempt to stop it. They were afraid that the numbers were against us on the SCOTUS.

They jumped on the band wagon after the battle was won

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

Go to full version