General Categories > Laws and Legislation

Missouri Introduces Bill To Confiscate Firearms

<< < (3/3)

SS_N_NE:
Why are all the Dems pushing this stuff right now? Seems odd for states to be pushing gun law until they see where federal control ends up.

With some 8 million gun owners distracted...what are they really up to?

bkoenig:

--- Quote from: SS_N_NE on February 15, 2013, 06:36:20 PM ---Why are all the Dems pushing this stuff right now? Seems odd for states to be pushing gun law until they see where federal control ends up.

With some 8 million gun owners distracted...what are they really up to?

--- End quote ---


They're pushing hard in all the state legislatures, trying to overwhelm the NRA.  They know gun rights advocates only have so many resources and have to pick their battles.

OnTheFly:

--- Quote from: bkoenig on February 15, 2013, 06:51:07 PM ---
They're pushing hard in all the state legislatures, trying to overwhelm the NRA.  They know gun rights advocates only have so many resources and have to pick their battles.

--- End quote ---

And that is exactly why we need this...

Put Your Money Where Your Mouth Is!

Fly

NE Bull:

--- Quote from: GreyGeek on February 15, 2013, 05:27:14 PM ---There are 52 DEMs and 109 REPUBs in the MO State legislature.    I'd wager that a bill  that extreme won''t pass.   Even  if it did it would be in direct violation  of the SCOTUS ruling of June 5 2008 which validated the claim that the  2A applies to  individuals, not "military", and several lawsuits would result.   The last ruling from SCOTUS was 5-4, which is  close.  One person can switch it.   Several  of the judges are old and/or in limited health.  And,  "accidents' can happen, which  would give the Pres an opportunity to stuff the court with Leftists.    If that happens, and they nullify the 2A,  there will be either  a voter revolution or a shooting one.

--- End quote ---
GreyGeek, did you just insinuate what I think you did?  ;) 8)  At this point nothing the Gubmit or detractors can or are willing to do would surprise me.

GreyGeek:

--- Quote from: NE Bull on February 15, 2013, 11:24:18 PM ---GreyGeek, did you just insinuate what I think you did?
--- End quote ---

That I did, and that is what I suspect will happen to at least two SCOTUS judges within the next three years.   It will be attributed to old age if they don't die in car "accidents", or fall out of the sky in a "malfunctioning" plane.

As an old fart I can  recall many of the incidents reported on this web page: http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/BODIES.html, especially those about Ron Brown, Vince Foster and Barry Seal.  The body count of unexplained or misexplained deaths are far out of proportion to the standard table of mortality death rates.  Find another politician in this country whose staff, aids, supporters that were working directly with the politician have even half the body count that the Clintons have.

Ricin was obviously used in at least one case, but certain compounds of Copper can  cause heart attacks at extremely small doses, and N-Bromo-Succinimide kills very quickly and break down in the body without a trace. It was (is?) legal  in Missouri to use NBS on arrows used to  hunt game to quicken the kill in order to reduce pain and suffering.   My Master's degree is in Biochemistry, with major hours in math and physics.    The number of compounds that can be surreptitiously administered to  cause death and  leave little or no trace are significant.    And, no trace is found if the Coroner doing the autopsy doesn't "find" the  agent, or flat out lies about it, as happened in more than one case in those listed above.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page