General Categories > Laws and Legislation

S. 54 Would Effectively Ban Even More Guns than Feinstein’s Bill!

<< < (3/3)

SS_N_NE:
Just did some research:

http://www.google.com/patents/US7111423

Inventors: Todd E. Lizotte, Orest Ohar
Original Assignee: Identification Dynamics, LLC

This ill conceived forensic process has huge negative reprecussions in numberous ways but has still passed legistlation in a few places, years ago. Apparently these guys have some politicians in their pockets and need to be outted for corruption.

A 2008? CA law even renders a firearm trash should any marked part fail/need replacement.

SS_N_NE:
It appears the CA law that included microstamping was signed by Swartzenegger back in 2007 and was to take place in 2010 but was based on having the patent rights eliminated. Apparently the patent issue remains and has blocked things. Would be a nice patent owner profit should government require the process and required gun owners cough up the expense. Again, the root interest is getting money to someone.

It is interesting that NY was recently pushing microstamping. They just had a 10 year run of requiring a fired cartridge case registered with each firearm purchased. It cost NY some $4 million a year. According to an article I read, the program failed to solve a single crime involving a firearm. I call $40 million spent for zero results a pretty poor "Return on Investment".

I used to prepare ROI reports for much smaller investments. Seems our politicians should be responsible for similar ROI efforts (penalty for failure).

abbafandr:
This was the reply I just got from Fischer:

March 4, 2013
 
 
Dear Donald,
 
Thank you for contacting me about gun control. As a fellow Nebraskan, your correspondence will play an important role in my decision-making on future gun-related legislation that may come before the Senate.
 
With the tragic events that took place in Colorado and Connecticut last year, many are calling for more federal gun laws. I am concerned about these efforts to restrict a law-abiding citizen’s right to own a firearm, which is clearly stated in the Constitution. These efforts do not preclude criminals from obtaining guns, nor do they prevent criminals from using guns to commit crimes.
 
Going forward, you can rest assured that I will continue to be mindful of law-abiding citizens’ right to own guns. I appreciate your input, and I hope you will stay in touch. If you have any additional questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to let me know or visit my website at www.fischer.senate.gov.
 
Sincerely,
 
 
Deb Fischer
United States Senator

A-FIXER:
I must be on the list as many letters I have sent and talked down Johanns on his choice for hagel... what a rino....

SS_N_NE:
"Continue to be mindful of law-abiding citizens’ right to own guns."

Overall a very non-committal response. "Mindful" is a pretty strong stance (insert sarcasm here).

"A law-abiding citizen’s right to own a firearm". WHAT firearm? Certain kinds? "A firearm", like in one?

 

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page