General Categories > Laws and Legislation

S. 54 Would Effectively Ban Even More Guns than Feinstein’s Bill!

<< < (2/3) > >>

abbafandr:
I requested Fischer's stand on this but have not gotten an answer yet.

A-FIXER:
She never answers me either she's scared or she is on the fence I don't like it but I am copying the above post and sending it as well....
AF

I also sent to congressman Smith, and the Govener

SS_N_NE:
In a reply letter to Fischer I have received and from an aide at her office on phone, there is the basic "believes in Second Amendment" reply, which is very general to anything. Seems to be the general reply from even the worst in their distorted way. Maybe we need to pressure Fischer for a strong stand?


On another point, that whole microstamping process needs to go away. It is obvious that some individual corporation owns this process and wants government money to turn it into something profitable. This process has been pushed politically in a number of ways and is as bad as any anti-gun law they can come up with. It will be the basis of additional cost to gun owners as most proposals have gun owners paying for marking and registration. Yes, registration of the marks allowing every thing bad of registration. And would outlaw any guns not marked, thus catching any guns brought in for marking that someone decides to pull from the public. Does anyone know the name of the individual and entity owning the microstamping process? This government money grab and it's instegators need to be called out for corrupt spending or this will get tucked into any violent crime it can be hidden into.

A-FIXER:
Thats a great question SS, some how some where it will line and benefit of washington I'll when I get a chance look as well.

zofoman:

--- Quote from: A-FIXER on March 02, 2013, 08:15:46 AM ---She never answers me either she's scared or she is on the fence I don't like it but I am copying the above post and sending it as well....
--- End quote ---


--- Quote from: SS_N_NE on March 02, 2013, 08:48:35 AM ---In a reply letter to Fischer I have received and from an aide at her office on phone, there is the basic "believes in Second Amendment" reply, which is very general to anything. Seems to be the general reply from even the worst in their distorted way. Maybe we need to pressure Fischer for a strong stand?
--- End quote ---

I have heard of these kinds of responses (on other topics as well) coming from Fischer.  There is something mysterious (to me anyway) about Fischer that I find her not trustworthy.   Regardless, I will push the emails and await the canned responses.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page