General Categories > Newsworthy

Obama's Supreme Court Justice pick

(1/3) > >>

Jay:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090526/ap_on_go_su_co/us_obama_supreme_court

BEN FELLER, Associated Press Writer Ben Feller, Associated Press Writer ? 35 mins ago

WASHINGTON ? President Barack Obama tapped federal appeals judge Sonia Sotomayor for the Supreme Court on Tuesday, officials said, making her the first Hispanic in history picked to wear the robes of a justice.

If confirmed by the Senate, Sotomayor, 54, would succeed retiring Justice David Souter. Two officials described Obama's decision on condition of anonymity because no formal announcement had been made.

Administration officials say Sotomayor would bring more judicial experience to the Supreme Court than any justice confirmed in the past 70 years.

A formal announcement was expected at midmorning.

Obama had said publicly he wanted a justice who combined intellect and empathy ? the ability to understand the troubles of everyday Americans.

Democrats hold a large majority in the Senate, and barring the unexpected, Sotomayor's confirmation should be assured.

If approved, she would join Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg as the second woman on the current court.

Sotomayor is a self-described "Newyorkrican" who grew up in a Bronx housing project after her parents moved to New York from Puerto Rico. She has dealt with diabetes since age 8 and lost her father at age 9, growing up under the care of her mother in humble surroundings. As a girl, inspired by the Perry Mason television show, she knew she wanted to be a judge.

A graduate of Princeton University and Yale Law School, a former prosecutor and private attorney, Sotomayor became a federal judge for the Southern District of New York in 1992.

As a judge, she has a bipartisan pedigree. She was first appointed by a Republican, President George H.W. Bush, then named an appeals judge by President Bill Clinton in 1997.

At her Senate confirmation hearing more than a decade ago, she said, "I don't believe we should bend the Constitution under any circumstance. It says what it says. We should do honor to it."

In one of her most memorable rulings as federal district judge, Sotomayor essentially salvaged baseball in 1995, ruling with players over owners in a labor strike that had led to the cancellation of the World Series.

As an appellate judge, she sided with the city of New Haven, Conn., in a discrimination case brought by white firefighters after the city threw out results of a promotion exam because two few minorities scored high enough. Ironically, that case is now before the Supreme Court.

Obama's nomination is the first by a Democratic president in 15 years.

His announcement also leaves the Senate four months ? more than enough by traditional standards ? to complete confirmation proceedings before the Court begins its next term in the fall.

Republicans have issued conflicting signals about their intentions. While some have threatened filibusters if they deemed Obama's pick too liberal, others have said that is unlikely.

Given Sotomayor's selection, any decision to filibuster would presumably carry political risks ? Hispanics are the fastest-growing segment of the population and an increasingly important one politically.

Abortion rights have been a flashpoint in several recent Supreme Court confirmations, although Sotomayor has not authored any controversial rulings on the subject.

Sotomayor's elevation to the appeals court was delayed by Republicans, in part out of concerns she might someday be selected for the Supreme Court. She was ultimately confirmed for the appeals court in 1998 on a 68-28 vote, gathering some Republican support.

Among those voting against her was Alabama Sen. Jeff Sessions, now the top Republican on the Judiciary Committee that will hold sway over her confirmation.

Now, more than a decade later, Sotomayor possesses credentials Sessions said he wanted in a pick for the high court ? years of experience on the bench. Obama had talked openly about the upside of choosing someone outside the judiciary ? every single current justice is a former federal appeals court judge ? but passed on at least two serious candidates who had never been judges.


Now,

Since the election, I have feared how Obama would influence the Supreme Court as openings came up. What do you all know about Judge Sotomayer? The quote "I don't believe we should bend the Constitution under any circumstance. It says what it says. We should do honor to it." has peaked my interest, but that was apparently said more than 10 years ago, and it is her interpretation of what she thinks the Constitution says that matters.

More research is in order.

FarmerRick:



And from here: http://www.scotusblog.com/wp/judge-sotomayors-appellate-opinions-in-civil-cases/

Second Amendment:  Sotomayor was also a member of the panel that issued a per curiam opinion in another controversial case that may be headed for the Court next year.  In Maloney v. Cuomo, 554 F.3d 56 (2009), the panel considered (as relevant here) a claim by a New York attorney that a state law prohibiting possession of a chuka stick (also known as nunchaku, a device used in martial arts consisting of two sticks joined by a rope or chain) violated his Second Amendment right to bear arms.  The district court rejected the claim on the ground that the Second Amendment does not apply to the states.  On appeal, the panel affirmed.  Relying on the Supreme Court?s 1886 decision in Presser v. Illinois, it explained that it was ?settled law . . . that the Second Amendment applies only to limitations the federal government seeks to impose? on the individual?s right to bear arms.  The Supreme Court?s recent decision in District of Columbia v. Heller, the court continued, ?does not invalidate this longstanding principle.?  And while acknowledging the possibility that ?Heller might be read to question the continuing validity of this principle,? the panel deemed itself bound to follow Presser because it ?directly controls, leaving to the Supreme Court the prerogative of overruling its own decisions.?  Maloney?s lawyers intend to file a petition for certiorari in late June.

My opinion:  She's not an ideal candidate, but not much worse than who she may be replacing.

Dark Helmet:
could be worse...

Dan W:

--- Quote from: Dark Helmet on May 26, 2009, 03:14:58 PM ---could be worse...

--- End quote ---

an avowed Liberal Activist that laughs about making policy from the bench... I could not be worse.

DJPeter:
I contacted Senator Mike Johanns and Ben Nelson and voiced my opinion and urged them to vote accordingly.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page