General Categories > Laws and Legislation
My CHP appeal is heading to the NE Supreme Court
bkoenig:
--- Quote from: unfy on August 30, 2013, 11:45:35 AM ---This... is gonna go kinda weird and sideways (er, that is possibly off topic).
There was another thread here in the forum (I think from late last year ?) ... about a town (not L or O) that was pushing for using arrest reports as something related to gun stuffs. Oh! It was that arrest reports would go on some kind of permarecord for use as just a data mining kind of thing. Guns, immigration, whatever.
This seems related ?
--- End quote ---
I've been told (I can't remember where or by who) that when Cassidy was Chief in Lincoln he would pay off duty officers to go through pistol registration forms and cross reference them with arrest reports, and if there was a hit they'd show up and confiscate your firearms. Not sure if it's true, but I'm inclined to believe it.
AAllen:
--- Quote from: unfy on August 30, 2013, 11:45:35 AM ---This... is gonna go kinda weird and sideways (er, that is possibly off topic).
There was another thread here in the forum (I think from late last year ?) ... about a town (not L or O) that was pushing for using arrest reports as something related to gun stuffs. Oh! It was that arrest reports would go on some kind of permarecord for use as just a data mining kind of thing. Guns, immigration, whatever.
This seems related ?
--- End quote ---
I believe what you are thinking of is a bill that was brought to the legislature to have some misdemeanor crimes require the taking of finger prints at the time of arrest (violent misdemeanors, drunk driving, and a couple of others). Currently this is something that is not required. The discussion kind of went this way into a big brother data mining and tracking you kind of thing.
unfy:
--- Quote from: AAllen on August 30, 2013, 12:15:24 PM ---I believe what you are thinking of is a bill that was brought to the legislature to have some misdemeanor crimes require the taking of finger prints at the time of arrest (violent misdemeanors, drunk driving, and a couple of others). Currently this is something that is not required. The discussion kind of went this way into a big brother data mining and tracking you kind of thing.
--- End quote ---
This sounds relevant yeah. Kinda like "i wasnt found guilty of anything, why am i being put into a criminal database" thing.
Yup, found it. LB-318.
http://nebraskafirearms.org/forum/index.php/topic,7523.msg53271.html#msg53271
edit: uhhhhh maybe should close this avenue of conversation, it might be way offtopic and threadjacking ?
Famous556:
I for one am very disappointed by the lower court and the NSP and am very pleased that you are getting your case taken to the NE supreme court.
Despite the circumstances behind the charges and conviction... it seems that the charge you were convicted of (the only one which should matter) does not invove an act of violence by its very name "attempted". I tire of these types of decisions being made by police officers. It reminds me of when the man who killed an armed robber in Walgreens in Omaha was denied an Omaha pistol possession permit or whatever it's officially called because of a weapons charge he was not yet convicted of and that was ultimately dropped. Guilty is Guilty once you're convicted, but the other charges should not be of any consequence once they are dropped or amended to a lower charge. That's the nature of our legal system. A dropped charge or amended charge should mean nothing forward from the point it is dropped or amended.
TracyW:
Good luck in your fight!
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version