NFOA MEMBERS FORUM
General Categories => Newsworthy => Topic started by: Range Mom on May 25, 2018, 10:36:09 AM
-
An alleged intruder is recovering in an Omaha hospital after reportedly being shot during an attempted break-in at a home in Wisner, Nebraska
http://www.wowt.com/content/news/Alleged-intruder-shot-during-reported-break-in-483686481.html
-
Hope it was righteous. We need news like this.
-
An alleged intruder is recovering
Sounds like the home owner needs better gun control. ;)
-
Is it possible that the home intruder didn’t realize that the locked door was for his protection? #occupationalhazard
-
Odd. Attempted break in, yet the suspect was found on the floor inside.
-
Odd. Attempted break in, yet the suspect was found on the floor inside.
Yeah, wondered about that too. ;)
-
Odd. Attempted break in, yet the suspect was found on the floor inside.
O=Kay...........
Just about Everyone on this here Forum by now has heard why the Perp is always found inside the home.
And a clean patch of lineoleum about two feet wide running from the door.
Just remindin'...........
That's All
sfg
-
Wisdom there SemperFi !
-
I find the difference in how the Omaha area news reported this and how the news in Norfolk reported it interesting.
It appears that the intruder was shot after he broke in and that no charges are being filed.
John K
http://norfolkdailynews.com/news/briefs/wisner-man-shot-recovering/article_c18697bc-5f92-11e8-9f80-534169ca7690.html
-
How long before we hear that the intruder sues the homeowner for shooting them while on the job?
-
I have relatives that live up the street from this, the perp is not mentally stable, was naked, and is know to be an issue.
-
How long before we hear that the intruder sues the homeowner for shooting them while on the job?
I heard that He's currently filing a workman's comp, claim against the homeowner!. ::) :laugh:
-
O=Kay...........
Just about Everyone on this here Forum by now has heard why the Perp is always found inside the home.
And a clean patch of lineoleum about two feet wide running from the door.
Just remindin'...........
That's All
sfg
The only way to do that adequately is to have a 2 oz spray bottle of Luminol (from Amazon for $12) handy and spray that area after washing it. Any missed traces of blood will glow with bluish florescence when all lights are out and windows blocked. Repeat washing till Liminol shows nothing. Good for detecting fingerprints too. However, most people do not realize how far specks and mist can travel, so maybe more than 2 oz would be needed to spray the walls, ceilings, furniture, fixtures, etc.. withing 2530 feet of the scene, or the entire room in which it supposedly took place. Don't miss the air vents, blood spray can travel several feet up the vent and even get trapped on the filter. With chain polymerase even a speck of blood can give a good DNA test.
However, if the person was shot outside and dragged in, Liminol & other agents would show the presence of invisible blood stains outside, as well, but spraying would have to be done at night or in a tent covering the scene in order to see & photograph the blueish glow. Cleaning the porch, the outside porch walls, walkway, rails, and especially the grass, would be very difficult. And the cleaning agent of choice, Chlorine bleach, leaves obvious telltale signs of use, evidence of a cover up which suggests the shooter knew his shoot wasn't "righteous".
Lack of signs of forced entry is another give away. The article reports that entry was forced. Did the reporter get that from the resident or from observations and statements made by law enforcement? If Luminol shows blood specks around the damaged area BUT NOT in the damaged area that is proof that the damage was done after the shooting took place. Uh oh.
Nothing beats good gun control and frank honesty. IF the perp survives and tells a story of a drug deal gone bad ... true or not it is "he said" against "he said". Evidence of previous drug use in the house, which is extremely difficult to eradicate, would seal the deal for prosecutors.
-
GG:
First of all and once more: glad you're back here on the Forum. [Your excellent post here is just one small example of why.]
Secondly, it's interesting to be mindful of a previous close-to-home case of twiddling with blood evidence:
http://journalstar.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/ex-csi-chief-kofoed-sentenced-to-prison/article_3ae347c6-6dcb-11df-ba80-001cc4c002e0.html
Cordially,
sfg
-
I've watched enough true crime shows to know no one ever cleans up all the blood, because it gets in places they don't think to look. In one case a woman claimed strangers knifed her husband. She had gotten rid of her bloody clothes including the gloves she wore to keep blood off her hands, and even took a shower but missed the drop of his blood, probably from the gloves, which the police found on a package of cigarettes in her car. She claimed she had never touched the body. And could not explain away that blood.
-
Shakespeare laid it out for all long ago in Macbeth:
Lady Macbeth speaking:
"Yet who would have thought the old man to have had so much blood in him.
(rubbing her hands) Come out, damned spot! Out, I say...."
Macbeth: Act 5, Scene 1
sfg