NFOA MEMBERS FORUM

General Categories => Newsworthy => Topic started by: huskergun on September 09, 2009, 09:26:29 PM

Title: Anti 2nd Amendment Cass Sustein. Vote was today.
Post by: huskergun on September 09, 2009, 09:26:29 PM

This got slipped in last night around midnight by Senate majority leader Harry Reed.
By the way Ben Nelson voted to give this guy a vote. Add this to our list of reasons to throw Ben out on the next election.


http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/26930.html
Title: Re: Anti 2nd Amendment Cass Sustein. Vote was today.
Post by: DanClrk51 on September 09, 2009, 10:01:41 PM
I have always voted against Ben, even though he is a moderate, he still pisses me off when he sides with the liberals when he thinks he can get away with it.
Title: Re: Anti 2nd Amendment Cass Sustein. Vote was today.
Post by: FarmerRick on September 09, 2009, 10:10:42 PM
Check your email.... ;)
Title: Re: Anti 2nd Amendment Cass Sustein. Vote was today.
Post by: SBarry on September 09, 2009, 10:33:04 PM
Ben would not like the email I just sent him, too bad he never actually reads them anyway. He will vote Suckstein in, no doubt in my mind.
Title: Re: Anti 2nd Amendment Cass Sustein. Vote was today.
Post by: FarmerRick on September 10, 2009, 04:44:29 PM
Sunstein was confirmed this afternoon.   >:(

At least Sen. Nelson voted against confirmation.  My call to his office last night may have helped a tiny bit.  ;)

Hopefully NFOA members did their part by contacting their Senators.


http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&session=1&vote=00274 (http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&session=1&vote=00274)

U.S. Senate Roll Call Votes 111th Congress - 1st Session

as compiled through Senate LIS by the Senate Bill Clerk under the direction of the Secretary of the Senate

Vote Summary

Question: On the Nomination (Confirmation of Cass R. Sunstein, of MA, to be Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget )
Vote Number:    274   Vote Date:    September 10, 2009, 03:41 PM
Required For Majority:    1/2   Vote Result:    Nomination Confirmed
Nomination Number:    PN323
Nomination Description:    Cass R. Sunstein, of Massachusetts, to be Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Office of Management and Budget
Vote Counts:   YEAs   57
   NAYs   40
   Not Voting   2
Vote Summary   By Senator Name   By Vote Position   By Home State

Alphabetical by Senator Name
Akaka (D-HI), Yea
Alexander (R-TN), Nay
Barrasso (R-WY), Nay
Baucus (D-MT), Yea
Bayh (D-IN), Yea
Begich (D-AK), Nay
Bennet (D-CO), Yea
Bennett (R-UT), Yea
Bingaman (D-NM), Yea
Bond (R-MO), Nay
Boxer (D-CA), Not Voting
Brown (D-OH), Yea
Brownback (R-KS), Nay
Bunning (R-KY), Nay
Burr (R-NC), Nay
Burris (D-IL), Yea
Byrd (D-WV), Not Voting
Cantwell (D-WA), Yea
Cardin (D-MD), Yea
Carper (D-DE), Yea
Casey (D-PA), Yea
Chambliss (R-GA), Nay
Coburn (R-OK), Nay
Cochran (R-MS), Nay
Collins (R-ME), Yea
Conrad (D-ND), Yea
Corker (R-TN), Nay
Cornyn (R-TX), Nay
Crapo (R-ID), Nay
DeMint (R-SC), Nay
Dodd (D-CT), Yea
Dorgan (D-ND), Yea
Durbin (D-IL), Yea
   Ensign (R-NV), Nay
Enzi (R-WY), Nay
Feingold (D-WI), Yea
Feinstein (D-CA), Yea
Franken (D-MN), Yea
Gillibrand (D-NY), Yea
Graham (R-SC), Nay
Grassley (R-IA), Nay
Gregg (R-NH), Nay
Hagan (D-NC), Yea
Harkin (D-IA), Yea
Hatch (R-UT), Yea
Hutchison (R-TX), Nay
Inhofe (R-OK), Nay
Inouye (D-HI), Yea
Isakson (R-GA), Nay
Johanns (R-NE), Nay
Johnson (D-SD), Yea
Kaufman (D-DE), Yea
Kerry (D-MA), Yea
Klobuchar (D-MN), Yea
Kohl (D-WI), Yea
Kyl (R-AZ), Nay
Landrieu (D-LA), Yea
Lautenberg (D-NJ), Yea
Leahy (D-VT), Yea
LeMieux (R-FL), Nay
Levin (D-MI), Yea
Lieberman (ID-CT), Yea
Lincoln (D-AR), Nay
Lugar (R-IN), Yea
McCain (R-AZ), Nay
McCaskill (D-MO), Yea
   McConnell (R-KY), Nay
Menendez (D-NJ), Yea
Merkley (D-OR), Yea
Mikulski (D-MD), Yea
Murkowski (R-AK), Nay
Murray (D-WA), Yea
Nelson (D-FL), Yea
Nelson (D-NE), Nay
Pryor (D-AR), Nay
Reed (D-RI), Yea
Reid (D-NV), Yea
Risch (R-ID), Nay
Roberts (R-KS), Nay
Rockefeller (D-WV), Yea
Sanders (I-VT), Nay
Schumer (D-NY), Yea
Sessions (R-AL), Nay
Shaheen (D-NH), Yea
Shelby (R-AL), Nay
Snowe (R-ME), Yea
Specter (D-PA), Yea
Stabenow (D-MI), Yea
Tester (D-MT), Yea
Thune (R-SD), Nay
Udall (D-CO), Yea
Udall (D-NM), Yea
Vitter (R-LA), Nay
Voinovich (R-OH), Yea
Warner (D-VA), Yea
Webb (D-VA), Nay
Whitehouse (D-RI), Yea
Wicker (R-MS), Nay
Wyden (D-OR), Yea
Title: Re: Anti 2nd Amendment Cass Sustein. Vote was today.
Post by: RLMoeller on September 10, 2009, 04:55:12 PM
This administration has become utterly ridiculous >:(

OK..  it's been that way all along, but it keeps getting worse!
Title: Re: Anti 2nd Amendment Cass Sustein. Vote was today.
Post by: Thomas on September 10, 2009, 05:28:05 PM
It just makes no sense for any senator from an agricultural/hunting state to vote for this man to be confirmed.
Title: Re: Anti 2nd Amendment Cass Sustein. Vote was today.
Post by: rugermanx on September 10, 2009, 08:50:46 PM
It just makes no sense for any senator from an agricultural/hunting state to vote for this man to be confirmed.

x2

The only thing it tells me is they don't care about their state enough to know what they are voting on or aren't actually representing their constituents. Either way I say GIVE EM THE BOOT.
Title: Re: Anti 2nd Amendment Cass Sustein. Vote was today.
Post by: RobertH on September 10, 2009, 09:30:45 PM
just like most of you guys, i would have been super pissed if any of our guys voted for this anti-hunting person.


if GOD didn't want us to hunt, he wouldn't have made animals taste sooooooo good.
Title: Re: Anti 2nd Amendment Cass Sustein. Vote was today.
Post by: DanClrk51 on September 11, 2009, 01:27:38 AM
I noticed several Democrats broke rank and voted against. Good for them I applaud them! [Webb (VA), Pryor (AR), Lincoln (AR), Nelson (NE), Begich (AK)]

Shame on the Republican traitors that stabbed us in the back! I find it repulsive that 6 Republicans voted for a guy that believes in banning hunting & that the 2nd Amendment is a collective right.
Title: Re: Anti 2nd Amendment Cass Sustein. Vote was today.
Post by: rugermanx on September 11, 2009, 02:33:14 AM
I have said it in other places (both on this forum and elsewhere) I am convinced that the party's don't matter. Both parties are going to the same place THEM IN POWER. You and I under their rule.

The breaking of rank- although in essence good- must be viewed with suspicion. Just because they broke rank means nothing. Alot of times they are "allowed" to break rank on certain issues. Especially on issues that could hurt them politically but are going to get thru anyway. So really it comes down to their intentions. Both parties have been heading toward bigger government (look at McCain he's not exactly "right wing nor is he really center- He's pretty much as far left as the Repubs could get while staying "conservative") I like you used to think that I was a republican and voted that way. Any more I am an independant, libertarian and will vote that way. The R and D mean nothing to me and honestly Nelson (although he went our way on this one) will still have me working to get his butt thrown out of there. This isn't the first time nor the last time that a Republican will stab us in the back. Unless we get some decent people in there with values and beliefs we are screwed.
Title: We need to explain Cass Sustein to the world (with cartoons). Vote was today.
Post by: iiranger on September 11, 2009, 03:16:28 PM
This person thinks animals should be able to sue hunters. Has he ever hired Orkin to exterminate in any property? Terminex? Used Decon. "Hoist him by his own petard..."
Title: Re: Anti 2nd Amendment Cass Sustein. Vote was today.
Post by: JimP on September 13, 2009, 03:08:43 PM
I noticed several Democrats broke rank and voted against.

There were plenty of Dems (some spoke from the podium!) at the March on Washington Saturday. It was pretty obvious to everyone there that the Execuative branch is out of control and the Congress is not doing what it is supposed to do.


This thing is going to grow...... There will be another one next year...... between now and then, there is a lot of work to do.