NFOA MEMBERS FORUM
General Categories => Newsworthy => Topic started by: dg870 on June 20, 2014, 05:03:08 PM
-
Has anyone else heard about this ruling on "Straw Purchases". I thought it was ok as long as the buyer was not prohibited from owing a firearm?
Sorry - You might have to copy and paste the link to get it to work. Can't tell if it is live when I post.
http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2014/06/robert-farago/breaking-u-s-supreme-court-upholds-straw-purchaser-law-provisions/ (http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2014/06/robert-farago/breaking-u-s-supreme-court-upholds-straw-purchaser-law-provisions/)
-
There is a discussion going on about this
http://nebraskafirearms.org/forum/index.php/topic,12161.0.html (http://nebraskafirearms.org/forum/index.php/topic,12161.0.html)
-
dg, go to the lin Dan posted and read the two links I posted from John Pierce on this.
The SCOTUS decision really doesn't change the law. More than anything it clarifies existing law.
-
In fact the ruling doesn't change ANYTHING, as stated above, just clarifies.
It has been a very common misconception to that strawman purchases were when a non prohibited person purchased a gun for a prohibited person, when in fact ANY person buying on another behalf ( bonafide gifting excluded ) is a strawman purchase and thus a felony.
-
It always has been if you are purchasing a firearm for someone else with their money, that is a straw purchase. If you purchase a firearm for someone as a gift that is and always has been fine.