NFOA MEMBERS FORUM
General Categories => Newsworthy => Topic started by: kozball on February 18, 2013, 11:10:18 AM
-
A very odd article but seems to have some merit.
"Clinging To A Broken Paradigm"
http://tlinexile.blogspot.com/ (http://tlinexile.blogspot.com/)
Comments?
-
While we are buying guns and ammo, the anti-Constitution folks (they are not against JUST the 2A, as a recent Liberal wag reminded us, they want to eliminate the ENTIRE Constitution) are teaching our kids in schools and delivering most the news they hear, watch or read, wrapped up in popular entertainment media, which is also owned by them. That's why the Left is against home or private schooling. They cannot control the thinking process of kids who are not under their control.
Most politicians recite their oath of office merely to check off a box, because they have mental reservations or purposes of evasion as to why they don't support the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th, 8th or 10th Amendments. And, because most do not believe in God, they do not accept the premise that our rights are God given and unalienable. They believe and teach that rights are licenses from the State which can be removed at any time and for any reason, as the state chooses. Of course, the "state" just happens to be the person in the highest political office at the time.
Meanwhile, citizens are losing their ability to be independent, partly because the state forces them into that situation, and they began accepting unearned gov checks as their "right". It will be exacerbated when they realize that they can blame someone else for their own failures, and the Democrats will only be too glad to help them make that realization. Then they start clamoring for more money because that is "their right" as well. It never enters their mind that a government which is big enough to give them everything you need is big enough to take everything they have. Sooner or later, "for the children" or for "social justice" the government will began dictating where they live and what they have to do to continue receiving the checks. And not long after that the "they" becomes "you".
Is there a political solution remaining? I'm hard pressed to see one. As long as politicians lie so easily, the media covers it up, and as long as a majority of people believe that decreasing the RATE OF INCREASES in government spending is "making drastic cuts", or that we can spend our way to prosperity, there is no hope because the sheep are not smart enough to climb out of the mud hole our politicians have put us in and will vote for the politician who lies most believably and promises the most. And most of the Democrats WANT a Socialist system, which is why the Congressional Progressive Caucus makes up 1/5th of the Congress and probably 1/3rd of the Senate.
-
Amen Preacher Grey... Amen
-
When the only freedom we want is freedom from responsibility, we will then no longer be free. :'(
-
Here....here sounds like we have 2 preachers...... Amen Brother....
-
....ummmm ...... so we are supposed to help the Saul Alinski Apostle in the Oval Office?
No.
Vote your consciensce. That way, the no one is under any illusion that the other side has a mandate.
-
I agree with most of his supporting points, but not the conclusion. I read something like 2+2 = tupperware. I'm NOT voting for a Liberal, I may not vote at all but I am NOT voting Liberal and ANY vote for a Demoncrat is a vote for Liberalism. Hasn't always been that way but most certainly is now.
Before the last election I argued with some here about the 'lesser of 2 evils' approach. No doubt Mitt was a poor choice. However anyone that claims to love Liberty that doesn't think he would be a vast improvement over the current POS....I mean POTUS, is not credible. GOP has lots of faults- but usually the lesser of 2 evils is the LESSER of 2 evils. Giving Carte Blanche to utter evil (Democrat Party) is surrender of any semblance of hope, not some sort of Jedi voting trick.
The time may come sooner than any of us hope that voting will not matter anymore.....until then you support the best candidate. If neither is an option then support neither, but throwing the game to get a better draft pick is utter foolishness in the real world. Elections have consequences.
-
....ummmm ...... so we are supposed to help the Saul Alinski Apostle in the Oval Office?
No.
Vote your consciensce. That way, the no one is under any illusion that the other side has a mandate.
Jim, I am unsure as to your thoughts as on that blog it was dated feb2 and the one koz posted was the latest feb19 which I thought we were commenting on. Am I in error again?
-
I personally believe in everything that you guys are saying here. I read, that the author thinks that if we vote "D" then after total controll like in 2009-2010, that the sheeple would eventually wake the F up and completely change the makeup of the .gov by voting completely "R" after some years under "SS" controll.
The fear here is that this could happen in 2014, with the election going to the Dark side. With this populace of takers I feel that it could 20 yrs or so before people realize that the damage that has been done is not reversable.
Either way, it doesn't look good and that just sucks for our children and grandchildren. :angry:
-
Jim, I am unsure as to your thoughts as on that blog it was dated feb2 and the one koz posted was the latest feb19 which I thought we were commenting on. Am I in error again?
The post I was commenting on was the one that suggested that we vote Democrat in order that the .gov would collpapse sooner ...... I think that is what the POTUS is trying to do anyhow- it is what Saul Alinsky preached to do..... and a collapse will not end well, for anyone, I think.
-
t is what Saul Alinsky preached to do.
How many have read Saul D. Alinksy's "Rules For Radicals"?
It is an excellent read and explain's the Left's political strategy very well, especially their 5th Rule, using ridicule. Ridiculing view points of everyone else but their own by mis-representing what others say and then applying mockery is their most potent weapon. Sarah Palin is a classic example. In the interview she had with Curic a question was asked about Russia. Palin, in part of her reply, said "There are places in Alaska from which you can see Russia." Saturday Night Live twisted her words by claiming that she said "You can see Russia from my house." Then they'd show a map of Alaska and pointed out that Russia wasn't visible from her town. Then came the mockery and the echo chamber, where when something is repeated often enough it carries the appearance of truth.
The person who taught Obama "Community Organizing" was taught by Alinksy. Alinsky dedicated his book to Satan, "the first rebel". Like Obama, Alinksy was trickey. He never practiced the faith of his parents, Judism, but never renounced it either. He claimed he never joined political parties, i.e., the Communist party, but his plans, friends and allies were all dedicated Marxists. And, he wasn't against using guns. When the Left was causing a lot of trouble in the late 60s, and even coopted the Democrat party at their Chicago convention, Alinsky thought "the revolution" was close and he and his best friend took pistols to the countryside outside of Chicago and practiced shooting with them.