NFOA MEMBERS FORUM

General Categories => General Firearm Discussion => Topic started by: gsd on August 29, 2013, 07:34:24 PM

Title: Just got this link from a fellow enthusiast
Post by: gsd on August 29, 2013, 07:34:24 PM
thoughts?

http://ammoheads.com/obama-bypasses-congress-signs-two-new-executive-orders-on-gun-control/ (http://ammoheads.com/obama-bypasses-congress-signs-two-new-executive-orders-on-gun-control/)
Title: Re: Just got this link from a fellow enthusiast
Post by: kozball on August 29, 2013, 07:44:52 PM
I am sure lots of us have many thoughts..........

Just can't post them here  :angry:
Title: Re: Just got this link from a fellow enthusiast
Post by: CitizenClark on August 29, 2013, 10:24:32 PM
Quote from: gsd on August 29, 2013, 07:34:24 PM
thoughts?

http://ammoheads.com/obama-bypasses-congress-signs-two-new-executive-orders-on-gun-control/ (http://ammoheads.com/obama-bypasses-congress-signs-two-new-executive-orders-on-gun-control/)

My thoughts are that the people writing these articles don't know what they are talking about.
Title: Re: Just got this link from a fellow enthusiast
Post by: Ronvandyn on August 30, 2013, 06:18:54 PM
Hmmm.  Trusts = Lawyers.  Lawyers like $$$.  Reducing the number of trusts = Less Lawyer pay.  Most congress critters are ... Lawyers.  Lawsuits = Lawyers.  Lawsuits = $$$ for Lawyers. 

I may be wrong, but somehow I see lawyers and courts (and $$$) in the near future because of these “Executive Orders”. 

Ron
Title: Re: Just got this link from a fellow enthusiast
Post by: gsd on September 01, 2013, 02:56:52 PM
Found a bit more information...

http://blog.princelaw.com/2013/08/30/atfs-new-devistating-proposed-rule-on-background-checks-for-fictitious-entity-nfa-applications/ (http://blog.princelaw.com/2013/08/30/atfs-new-devistating-proposed-rule-on-background-checks-for-fictitious-entity-nfa-applications/)
Title: Re: Just got this link from a fellow enthusiast
Post by: CitizenClark on September 01, 2013, 03:25:59 PM
Quote from: gsd on September 01, 2013, 02:56:52 PM
Found a bit more information...

http://blog.princelaw.com/2013/08/30/atfs-new-devistating-proposed-rule-on-background-checks-for-fictitious-entity-nfa-applications/ (http://blog.princelaw.com/2013/08/30/atfs-new-devistating-proposed-rule-on-background-checks-for-fictitious-entity-nfa-applications/)

[legal pedantry]Sigh. Trusts are not "legal entities" in the strict, most correct sense of that term. They are relationships as to property in which the legal ownership and beneficial interest in said property are divided between at least two different people.[/legal pedantry]

I agree with the sentiment, though, and I think the Prince Law blog is covering these developments better than anyone else.