< Back to the Main Site

Author Topic: Editorial From Borelli Consulting/  (Read 1269 times)

Offline ranger04

  • Valued Volunteer
  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Feb 2008
  • Location: Columbus Nebraska
  • Posts: 143
Editorial From Borelli Consulting/
« on: September 29, 2009, 01:10:50 PM »


www.newamericantruth.com


Here's a little food for thought!


The True Citizen Soldier


No, this article is not about National Guardsmen (or women). It's not about any state or county run organization that empowers citizens to act as a group during any crisis. This article is about Joseph Average Citizen - otherwise known as Joe Citizen - and what power Joe Citizen has against both crime and terrorism in this country. I don't think many people realize just how powerful of a person Joe Citizen is. In fact, I think many Joe Citizens walk around day in and day out in a haze... a haze brought on by being blissfully unaware of what is going on around them. I believe that many citizens stay in this state of unawareness until something happens to wake them up. Usually that something is an emergency that mandates an immediate reaction from them. Unfortunately, what they decide to do - how they react - will be entirely dependent on what they've observed and how it affects them. If they've not observed anything because they're in their own little world, then their reaction may not be appropriate or effective. If Joe Citizen would simply sometimes pay attention the power of our collective citizenry would be formidable. Here's how...

In our country today there are an estimated 900,000 law enforcement professionals. That's 900,000 out of an estimated 300,000,000 residents. What's that ratio? One law officer for every three hundred thirty three (333) people - approximately. Hmmm... that seems a fair ratio. According to the United States Census Bureau, we're gaining one person about every eleven seconds. I can almost promise you that we're not gaining that many cops so the ratio is going down.

Our standing military has an approximate 1.4 million members (according to the online encyclopedia, Wikipedia). That's 1.4 million if you combine the Army, Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps and include all of the Reserves and National Guard. That's a ratio of one soldier for every two hundred and fourteen residents.

I think we all agree that uniformed service - whether it's military or law enforcement - presents a significant defending force in our country today. The military motto of "Protect and Defend" refers to protecting our country and defending its borders. In essence, the military looks OUT from the United States. Law enforcement, on the other hand, is there to "Protect and Serve". That protection from crime and public service happens INSIDE our borders. However, repeated court decisions have made it clear that law enforcement professionals have no legal responsibility for each resident's safety. Indeed it's entirely unreasonable to even think that our police officers and / or deputies could be everywhere we need them to be to protect everyone all the time.

While that number above, 1 cop for every 333 citizens, sounds good, you have to remember that not all 900K cops are on duty at the same time - and citizens don't live in shifts. And, while we might assume that the 900K count of law enforcement officers means 300,000 are on duty at a time (three 8-hour shifts per day, right?) the reality is that it takes FIVE police professionals to work a full 24 hour shift. That's because they work five out of seven days each week, have court, training, vacation, sick time, etc. So, divide that 900,000 by five and you get 180,000 on duty at any given time. THAT 180,000 translates into one law enforcement professional for every 1,667 citizens. All of a sudden the numbers don't look so terrific for personal service, eh?

So, who out there might do a little better? How about the citizens themselves? Of course, criminals don't have any compunctions stopping them from carrying and using weapons, so the citizens have to be able to meet violence with an equal or greater level of violence. So, I assumed - and I know it's a bad assumption up front - but I assumed that only citizens who carry guns are law enforcement equivalents when it comes to detering or fighting against crime. Hmmm... how many citizens in this country carry guns? I was unable to get nationwide numbers but I was able to get the numbers for a few states and it was pretty cool:

Based on internet research the following states have issued the approximate number of Concealed Carry Permits. Now I know that not every holder of a Concealed Carry Permit actually carries a gun all the time... but they can, so I counted them.
Texas------------247,345
Florida----------488,188
Georgia----------190,000
Arizona-----------36,675
Utah--------------79,353
Michigan---------140,000
New York---------530,000
Pennsylvania-----575,000
North Carolina---263,100

TOTAL of NINE states listed: 2,549,661

And since we've already established that citizens don't live in shifts, that equates to one armed citizen for every 117 residents. Wow... no wonder crime rates are dropping. But here's another thought: no wonder we haven't seen a sudden rash of Suicide (HOMICIDE) Bombers or terrorist shooters.

Now, I know there's another way of looking at those numbers - again, only shown from nine states - that make a few people unhappy. Here's one: 2,549,661 gun carrying citizens means that they outnumber our law enforcement professionals almost 3-to-1 total, or 14-to-1 for on-duty officers. Remember, we're only talking about the numbers from nine states!

Heck, our armed citizens in those nine states outnumbers our standing military force by more than a million and SOME of those armed citizens could be National Guardsman themeselves. I can assure you that having a armed citizenry of that size causes some politicians to take pause... because that's a blatant example of the power of our 2nd Amendment.

So, what's my point? My point is that our citizenry presents a far scarier deterent to terrorism and crime than the police or military forces do. Sure, the cop on the corner in uniform with busy eyes is a great visible deterent. But how many little old ladies going to or from the grocery store on that sidewalk are armed? The point is that terrorists can fairly easily identify cops and soldiers. Identifying Americans is pretty easy. Identifying which of us are armed isn't so easy. Identifying which of us is armed and more than happy to shoot a terrorist is less so. They have to assume that we are ALL willing - and perhaps even happy - to shoot them to stop a Homicide Bombing or other attack.

These numbers - raw statistics - support a belief I've stated before and I heard first from John Giduck: Terrorists aren't afraid of AmeriCA, but they are afraid of AmeriCANS.

Folks, the numbers reported here are only nine out of how many? 37? 38 states that have Shall Issue carry laws? Multiply the number by four and you get TEN MILLION armed citizens in this country. That's ONE armed citizen for every 30 residents. That's a reality that terrorists don't want to deal with - but are trying to find a way. Do the math. They like operations that have a good chance of success. They usually plan four at a time fully expecting that something will go wrong and only one will be successful.

If one out of every thirty Americans is armed, that means out of 100 citizens on the street, at least three have a gun with which to shoot and disable / kill a terrorist who makes himself known by presenting any kind of threat. And he has no way of identifying which three out of a hundred. How can they prepare for that?

I'm reminded of the story of the Homicide Bomber that opened her robes in an Israeli market place. A house wife out shopping drew her pistol and, with a single headshot, prevented the bomber from detonating. THAT is the power of an armed citizenry. It's a power we need to leverage instead of arguing about whether or not carrying guns is Constitutionally protected.

As a police officer I'm not bothered at all by the number of citizens who are legally armed and licensed to carry. I welcome them. They are the good guys. They are the kind of Americans who fought and bled for our freedom two centuries ago. They are the hard working, often veteran, culturally mixed people who simply want the chance to pursue peace, liberty and justice. They work hard and want to earn a fair wage. They don't ask for handouts. They often give more help than they can afford. As Garth Brooks says, "We don't reach for handouts; we reach for those who are down."

This country has built a great reputation fighting for... defending the underdogs of the world. It's made us strong and that ethos is one that we have to continue to build and develop. America of the future can be even stronger - but we have to quit the internal squabbling.

I'll step down off my soap box... Read the numbers. Recognize that our armed citizens represent a greater defense force - our citizen soldiers - than our law enforcement or military. AMERICANS are what makes America strong - and the whole world knows it.

BE SAFE!

   

Offline Dan W

  • NFOA Co-Founder
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Location: Lincoln NE
  • Posts: 8143
Re: Editorial From Borelli Consulting/
« Reply #1 on: September 29, 2009, 07:03:34 PM »
Great editorial... Thanks ranger04
Dan W    NFOA Co Founder
Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom.   J. F. K.

Offline Dark Helmet

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 185
Re: Editorial From Borelli Consulting/
« Reply #2 on: October 12, 2009, 05:44:35 PM »
only problem is that for all 37 r 38 states with "shall issue" you probably won't double that 2.5MM, since places like NE have what, 10-15K?

Offline rugermanx

  • Powder Benefactor
  • *
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Location: Prague, NE
  • Posts: 224
Re: Editorial From Borelli Consulting/
« Reply #3 on: October 12, 2009, 06:03:08 PM »
Great article, good find, ranger.
The U. S. Constitution doesn't guarantee happiness, only the pursuit of it. You have to catch up with it yourself. Benjamin Franklin

Offline Dan W

  • NFOA Co-Founder
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Location: Lincoln NE
  • Posts: 8143
Re: Editorial From Borelli Consulting/
« Reply #4 on: October 12, 2009, 06:47:10 PM »
I read somewhere that the population that will CCW generally floats at 1-2% of the total. I believe that came from a book by John Lott (More guns, less crime?)
Dan W    NFOA Co Founder
Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom.   J. F. K.

Offline rugermanx

  • Powder Benefactor
  • *
  • Join Date: Jun 2008
  • Location: Prague, NE
  • Posts: 224
Re: Editorial From Borelli Consulting/
« Reply #5 on: October 13, 2009, 02:51:32 AM »
I think you are right Dan, I am pretty sure I have heard that statistic, it may have been from More guns, Less Crime. It has been an awful long time since I read it (over a decade) but I think that's right.
The U. S. Constitution doesn't guarantee happiness, only the pursuit of it. You have to catch up with it yourself. Benjamin Franklin