I think it should be pointed out that according to FBI data more people are killed with so-called personal weapons, which means hands, feet, teeth, etc. than by all rifles combined. And just one type of rifle is supposedly so dangerous that gun control crusaders have been trying to outlaw it for decades. So hands and feet must be pretty dangerous.
That means that if it's illegal to have a rifle within reach (unless you have purchased a permission slip to exercise your constitutional right to bear arms), it must also be illegal for your hands and feet to be in reach of your hands. This might create a problem with compliance. And if you are wearing gloves, are your hands concealed weapons (even though they might be printing)?
Regarding Ernie Chambers, I'd like to point out again that he is only a powerful senator because the RINO majority gives him power. If I read the information on Ballotpedia right, our legislature contains 12 Democrats, 35 Republicans, 1 Independent, and 1 Libertarian (who I assume would be pro-freedom). With that makeup, or anything close to that makeup, there is no reason for Nebraska to have gun laws as restrictive as we have, and no reason Ernie Chambers should be anything but a minor annoyance. Unless we are electing RINOs instead of real Republicans.
