< Back to the Main Site

Author Topic: More double dealing by the NRA  (Read 3274 times)

Offline JimP

  • Steel Benefactor
  • *
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Posts: 1310
More double dealing by the NRA
« on: May 10, 2009, 09:15:50 PM »
http://thearmedschoolteacher.blogspot.com/2009/05/nra-playing-kill-bill-against.html

I could not remember the bill number for Asshford's "Too Dangerous For Civilian Use List"..... anybody else remember it?
The Right to Keep and BEAR Arms is enshrined explicitly in both our State and Federal Constitutions, yet most of us are afraid to actually excercise that Right, for very good reason: there is a good chance of being arrested........ and  THAT is a damned shame.  III.

Offline Rich B

  • NFOA Co-Founder
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 864
Re: More double dealing by the NRA
« Reply #1 on: May 14, 2009, 08:42:53 AM »
I wouldn't consider that double-dealing and I can also see the NRA's point regarding preemption.

A neutral stance may have been more PC. 
NRA Life Member.

Offline 00BUCK

  • Powder Benefactor
  • *
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Location: Bellevue
  • Posts: 510
Re: More double dealing by the NRA
« Reply #2 on: May 14, 2009, 02:05:51 PM »
This is the kind of stuff that made me stop being an NRA member.

For the last 17 years or so they have been "Negotiating Rights Away"


Offline huskergun

  • Gun Show Volunteer
  • Powder Benefactor
  • *
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Location: South West Omaha
  • Posts: 598
Re: More double dealing by the NRA
« Reply #3 on: May 14, 2009, 07:30:43 PM »
00BUCK,
What about Heller?? I think the NRA fought hard for that and did what they were supposed to do.
Neutral stance would have been the more appropriate thing to do though.
 I don't think Charlston Heston was negotiating my rights away.
The NRA is the only pro Second Amendment group with any clout in this country. They must have the support of every gun owner in this country. Not every one can be happy with everything all the time..Right??
??? for you......Why do you think the NRA is so bad? Just curious.
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
Thomas Jefferson




No Free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.
Thomas Jefferson.

Offline Dan W

  • NFOA Co-Founder
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Location: Lincoln NE
  • Posts: 8143
Re: More double dealing by the NRA
« Reply #4 on: May 14, 2009, 07:51:56 PM »
Initially the NRA said that Heller was too big a gamble to take and even brought some lawsuits in an attempt to stop it. They were afraid that the numbers were against us on the SCOTUS.

They jumped on the band wagon after the battle was won
Dan W    NFOA Co Founder
Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom.   J. F. K.

Offline Dan W

  • NFOA Co-Founder
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Location: Lincoln NE
  • Posts: 8143
Re: More double dealing by the NRA
« Reply #5 on: May 14, 2009, 08:01:11 PM »
Sunday, March 11, 2007
The truth about the NRA

From The Washington Times:

Disarmed residents of the nation's capital, which is also the nation's murder capital, seem to have attracted a powerful ally in Sen. Orrin Hatch, Utah Republican. The D.C. Personal Protection Act, introduced by Mr. Hatch on July 15, would repeal the District's 27-year ban on handguns and lift prohibitions on carrying weapons in homes and businesses.

Yes, Congress has been through this before. For the first time, however, someone with the heft of Orrin Hatch is leading the charge. Why Mr. Hatch? And why his sudden preoccupation with D.C. after 27 years? As Council Member Kathy Patterson (Democrat of Ward 3) put it: "I can't believe a senator of his stature would waste time on something like that." Of course, defenseless Washingtonians, at the mercy of the local drug gangs, may have a different view of what constitutes wasted time. Still, that doesn't explain Mr. Hatch's sudden emergence as a crusader for repeal.

Enter the National Rifle Association, a Hatch supporter (and vice versa), the organization most closely associated with vindicating gun-owners' rights. Now it gets really convoluted, because the facts suggest Mr. Hatch and the NRA are doing everything they can to prevent the Supreme Court from upholding the Second Amendment. Here's the untold story behind the Hatch bill: It was concocted by the NRA to head off a pending lawsuit, Parker vs. District of Columbia, which challenges the D.C. gun ban on Second Amendment grounds.

In February, joined by two other attorneys, we filed the Parker case, a civil lawsuit in federal court on behalf of six D.C. residents who want to be able to defend themselves with a handgun in their own homes. When we informed the NRA of our intent, we were advised to abandon the effort. Surprisingly, the expressed reason was that the case was too good. It could succeed in the lower courts then move up to the Supreme Court where, according to the NRA, it might receive a hostile reception.

Maybe so. But with a Republican president filling vacancies, one might expect the court's composition to improve by the time our case was reviewed. More important, if a good case doesn't reach the nine justices, a bad one will. Spurred by Attorney General John Ashcroft's endorsement of an individual right to bear arms, public defenders across the country are invoking the Second Amendment as a defense to prosecution. How long before the high court gets one of those cases, with a crack dealer as the Second Amendment's poster child?

Despite that risk, the NRA seems determined to derail our case. Nearly two months after we filed our lawsuit, the NRA filed a copycat suit on behalf of five D.C. residents and moved to consolidate its case with ours. Both suits challenged the same regulations, asked the same relief, and raised the same Second Amendment arguments. But the NRA included several unrelated constitutional and statutory counts, each of which would prolong and complicate our case and give the court a path around the Second Amendment.

Worse still, the NRA sued not only the District of Columbia but also Mr. Ashcroft, presumably because the Justice Department prosecutes felonies in D.C. Yet no NRA plaintiff is at risk of a felony prosecution. Joining Mr. Ashcroft simply adds months to the litigation so the court can decide whether he is a proper defendant. Regrettably, we now have two suits, one of which is unnecessary and counterproductive.

Thankfully, on July 8, federal Judge Emmet Sullivan, wishing "to avoid any protracted delay in the resolution of the merits in either case," denied the NRA's motion to consolidate. That means the NRA failed in its attempt to control the legal strategy. Just one week later, Mr. Hatch introduced his bill. The timing is suspicious, to say the least. If enacted, Mr. Hatch's D.C. Personal Protection Act could result in the dismissal of our lawsuit. After all, plaintiffs cannot challenge a law that no longer exists.

Everything points to an NRA effort to frustrate Parker. Why was the bill introduced by Mr. Hatch rather than some back-bencher? Why not wait for a court decision (the legislative option is always open, even if the court were to go the wrong way on the Second Amendment)? Why did the NRA file its suit at the outset? Why raise extraneous legal claims, then move to consolidate with Parker, a clean Second Amendment case? Why include Mr. Ashcroft when he is so obviously an improper defendant? Essentially, the NRA is saying, "If we can't control the litigation, there will be no litigation."

Yes, the rights of D.C. residents can be vindicated by either legislation or litigation. But a narrow bill aimed at the D.C. Code will have negligible impact on gun-owners' rights when contrasted with an unambiguous pronouncement, applicable across the nation, from the U.S. Supreme Court.

 
Dan W    NFOA Co Founder
Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom.   J. F. K.

Offline huskergun

  • Gun Show Volunteer
  • Powder Benefactor
  • *
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Location: South West Omaha
  • Posts: 598
Re: More double dealing by the NRA
« Reply #6 on: May 14, 2009, 09:03:10 PM »
"Initially the NRA said that Heller was too big a gamble to take and even brought some lawsuits in an attempt to stop it. They were afraid that the numbers were against us on the SCOTUS. "

"They jumped on the band wagon after the battle was won"


I never heard any of this before. Interesting read. Thanks
Just a thought though.... If I may.... I think I would rather have the NRA bring a law suit regarding the Second Amendment and my rights than the Washington Times. Just my thoughts.
 Anyways..... A phrase comes to mind..
We must stand together or we will hang separately.....(something like that)..Just something to think about.....
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
Thomas Jefferson




No Free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.
Thomas Jefferson.

Offline Dan W

  • NFOA Co-Founder
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Location: Lincoln NE
  • Posts: 8143
Re: More double dealing by the NRA
« Reply #7 on: May 14, 2009, 09:33:51 PM »
The Washington Times was just printing an article by the attorney that brought the Parker case,  Robert Levy was his name.

The Parker case became DC v Heller
« Last Edit: May 14, 2009, 09:35:31 PM by Dan W »
Dan W    NFOA Co Founder
Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom.   J. F. K.

Offline Josh1776

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 47
Re: More double dealing by the NRA
« Reply #8 on: May 14, 2009, 09:46:48 PM »
I try to keep up on thew news as best as I can...I thought the U.S. Supreme Court recenlty ruled that D.C. citizens can own handguns in their homes...is the discussion above a re-cap of that events leading up to this ruling.
"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." -H.L. Mencken

Offline Dan W

  • NFOA Co-Founder
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Location: Lincoln NE
  • Posts: 8143
Re: More double dealing by the NRA
« Reply #9 on: May 14, 2009, 09:47:36 PM »
Don't take my stance on the NRA as too negative, I am a  longtime member and I do support most of the things they do, But I don't drink the Koolaid.

Like Reagan said...."Trust, but verify."
Dan W    NFOA Co Founder
Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom.   J. F. K.

Offline Dan W

  • NFOA Co-Founder
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Location: Lincoln NE
  • Posts: 8143
Re: More double dealing by the NRA
« Reply #10 on: May 14, 2009, 09:48:40 PM »
I try to keep up on thew news as best as I can...I thought the U.S. Supreme Court recenlty ruled that D.C. citizens can own handguns in their homes...is the discussion above a re-cap of that events leading up to this ruling.

Yes it is a rehash of past NRA issues
Dan W    NFOA Co Founder
Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom.   J. F. K.

Offline Josh1776

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 47
Re: More double dealing by the NRA
« Reply #11 on: May 14, 2009, 09:54:51 PM »
Yes it is a rehash of past NRA issues

Okay. Thanks for the info.
"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." -H.L. Mencken

Offline 00BUCK

  • Powder Benefactor
  • *
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Location: Bellevue
  • Posts: 510
Re: More double dealing by the NRA
« Reply #12 on: May 14, 2009, 11:40:42 PM »
00BUCK,
What about Heller?? I think the NRA fought hard for that and did what they were supposed to do.
Neutral stance would have been the more appropriate thing to do though.
 I don't think Charlston Heston was negotiating my rights away.
The NRA is the only pro Second Amendment group with any clout in this country. They must have the support of every gun owner in this country. Not every one can be happy with everything all the time..Right??
??? for you......Why do you think the NRA is so bad? Just curious.

I will not be part of an organization that will not defend my right 100% and never give an inch. They have repeatedly throughout the last 20 years been in "negotiations" with the anti's. Completely unacceptable to me, so I support other, more like-minded organizations.
Not saying that stance is one that everyone should take, but it is the one I take.

Offline Dtrain323i

  • Powder Benefactor
  • *
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 136
Re: More double dealing by the NRA
« Reply #13 on: May 15, 2009, 11:56:41 AM »
NRA doesn't really do a whole lot in IL. It's the ISRA and Illinoiscarry.org people that do most of the pro-2A legwork there. Things like the IGOLD march and the pro CCW events in Chicago are all organized at the state level.

Offline Chris Z

  • NFOA Co-Founder
  • *****
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Location: Lincoln NE
  • Posts: 2496
    • Nebraska Concealed Carry Training
Re: More double dealing by the NRA
« Reply #14 on: May 15, 2009, 05:43:12 PM »
I have made it clear before, I am not a big fan of the NRA. However I am a member, and I am appreciative of many things they have accomplished. I came to the realization though in the last couple years that the NRA will not be the ones who gets things done in our Legislature, it will be an effort of the people who live here and care about Nebraska.

The reason why NFOA is here now.

Offline DJPeter

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 48
  • .
Re: More double dealing by the NRA
« Reply #15 on: May 15, 2009, 07:40:43 PM »
NRA is a national organization that has a lot of clot and is worthy of their support they receive. The collective members of NRA have won many battles to maintain our right to bear arms in this country. However, I feel our voices, opinions and views have more impact at the State level than the national level. NFOA is a big part of that.


"A well regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained in arms, is the best most natural defense of a free country".
James Madison

Offline huskergun

  • Gun Show Volunteer
  • Powder Benefactor
  • *
  • Join Date: Jan 2009
  • Location: South West Omaha
  • Posts: 598
Re: More double dealing by the NRA
« Reply #16 on: May 15, 2009, 09:31:06 PM »
I love this site. I have learned so much and proud to be associated with the NFOA...........and NRA.
 Thumbs up to Dan and Chris.
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.
Thomas Jefferson




No Free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.
Thomas Jefferson.

Offline Josh1776

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 47
Re: More double dealing by the NRA
« Reply #17 on: May 16, 2009, 12:15:03 AM »
"...the NRA will not be the ones who gets things done in our Legislature, it will be an effort of the people who live here and care about Nebraska...The reason why NFOA is here now."

Well said!
"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary." -H.L. Mencken

Offline Rich B

  • NFOA Co-Founder
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Posts: 864
Re: More double dealing by the NRA
« Reply #18 on: May 17, 2009, 04:23:37 PM »
Initially the NRA said that Heller was too big a gamble to take and even brought some lawsuits in an attempt to stop it. They were afraid that the numbers were against us on the SCOTUS.

They jumped on the band wagon after the battle was won

Back when Heller (i.e., Parker) started, it was doubtful the case would have been won without Alito and Roberts.  The case was a gamble and it wasn't an overwhelming majority.  The NRA knew that if we lost it would have been devastating.

Roberts was to replace O'Connor, who leaned left in her later years.  If she was one the bench, it very well could've been a 4-5 LOSS for us.  Ultimately, Rehnquist died before Roberts was confirmed and Roberts replaced Rehnquist and Alito replaced O'Connor.
NRA Life Member.

Offline Rifleman

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Location: Sandhills
  • Posts: 14
  • NRA Life Member / Instructor Certification
    • The Celtic Traveler
Re: More double dealing by the NRA
« Reply #19 on: May 18, 2009, 08:23:08 PM »
I agree that Nebraskans need to take care of Nebraska's issues. (And we're doing pretty well right now.)

At the same time that I have issues with the NRA, I recognize that we still have the 2A very largely as a result of their efforts. Boycotting them or bad-mouthing their efforts is? if I may coin a shooting metaphor? shooting yourself in the foot.

The NRA is a political organization and as such makes political, strategic, and tactical decisions, some of which are unpopular and may even seem Machiavellian. But they are the best game in town IMO. My experience with the GOA has been less than satisfactory. My take on them is that they are disorganized and sloppy.

Warts and all, it's the NRA for me. YMMV.