< Back to the Main Site
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Background check failed the Senate.  (Read 2943 times)

Offline DanClrk51

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Location: Bellevue
  • Posts: 1128
Re: Background check failed the Senate.
« Reply #20 on: April 17, 2013, 05:01:58 PM »
Burr Amendment (Restoration of Due Process for Veterans) has been defeated: Yeahs 56 Nos 44 (needed 60 to pass)
Logged

Offline unfy

  • Lead Benefactor
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Location: TN (was La Vista, NE)
  • Posts: 1830
  • !!! SCIENCE !!!
Re: Background check failed the Senate.
« Reply #21 on: April 17, 2013, 05:03:11 PM »
Blumenthal -- magazines over 30 rounds

And more b.s. .... police outgunned due to 'high cap magazines' etc...
Logged
hoppe's #9 is not the end all be all woman catching pheramone people make it out to be ... cause i smell of it 2 or 3 times a week but remain single  >:D

Offline DanClrk51

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Location: Bellevue
  • Posts: 1128
Re: Background check failed the Senate.
« Reply #22 on: April 17, 2013, 05:04:25 PM »
Lautenberg-Blumenthal Amendment (bans magazines that hold more than 10 rounds)
Logged

Offline unfy

  • Lead Benefactor
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Location: TN (was La Vista, NE)
  • Posts: 1830
  • !!! SCIENCE !!!
Re: Background check failed the Senate.
« Reply #23 on: April 17, 2013, 05:08:04 PM »
Grassley is awesome \o/
Logged
hoppe's #9 is not the end all be all woman catching pheramone people make it out to be ... cause i smell of it 2 or 3 times a week but remain single  >:D

Offline unfy

  • Lead Benefactor
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Location: TN (was La Vista, NE)
  • Posts: 1830
  • !!! SCIENCE !!!
Re: Background check failed the Senate.
« Reply #24 on: April 17, 2013, 05:22:53 PM »
Lautenberg / Blumenthal defeated 46/54

Out of curiosity, what was the first amendment ?
Logged
hoppe's #9 is not the end all be all woman catching pheramone people make it out to be ... cause i smell of it 2 or 3 times a week but remain single  >:D

Offline DanClrk51

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Location: Bellevue
  • Posts: 1128
Re: Background check failed the Senate.
« Reply #25 on: April 17, 2013, 05:23:01 PM »
Lautenberg-Blumenthal Amendment (bans magazines that hold more than 10 rounds) has been defeated!: Yeas 46  Neas 54

..It needed 60 yea votes to pass
« Last Edit: April 17, 2013, 05:25:21 PM by DanClrk51 »
Logged

Offline unfy

  • Lead Benefactor
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Location: TN (was La Vista, NE)
  • Posts: 1830
  • !!! SCIENCE !!!
Re: Background check failed the Senate.
« Reply #26 on: April 17, 2013, 05:28:56 PM »
Was there no amendment before the Schumer/Toomey one ?

I only count 5 sets of votes ?
Logged
hoppe's #9 is not the end all be all woman catching pheramone people make it out to be ... cause i smell of it 2 or 3 times a week but remain single  >:D

Offline Ghost

  • Steel Benefactor
  • *
  • Join Date: May 2010
  • Location: Waverly
  • Posts: 181
  • NRA Life Member - 1972
Re: Background check failed the Senate.
« Reply #27 on: April 17, 2013, 05:37:25 PM »
Quote from: unfy on April 17, 2013, 03:59:43 PM
Background check failed, 54-46

That was Manchin-Toomey.  It was the first amendment the Senate voted on.
Logged
A well-regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free State......George Mason

Offline unfy

  • Lead Benefactor
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Location: TN (was La Vista, NE)
  • Posts: 1830
  • !!! SCIENCE !!!
Re: Background check failed the Senate.
« Reply #28 on: April 17, 2013, 05:44:21 PM »
CSPAN was saying there were 6 votes tonight, i only counted 5 ?  CSPAN wrong ? Me wrong ? I'm confused ?

And what are the few remaining amendments for tomorrow morning ?
Logged
hoppe's #9 is not the end all be all woman catching pheramone people make it out to be ... cause i smell of it 2 or 3 times a week but remain single  >:D

Offline DanClrk51

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Location: Bellevue
  • Posts: 1128
Re: Background check failed the Senate.
« Reply #29 on: April 17, 2013, 05:50:08 PM »
Now Harry Reid is trying to shame the Republicans for not voting to expand background checks by using the victims again. He says its not over and that this is just the beginning.
Logged

Offline DanClrk51

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Location: Bellevue
  • Posts: 1128
Re: Background check failed the Senate.
« Reply #30 on: April 17, 2013, 05:50:48 PM »
Not sure CSpan is saying 7 amendments were defeated
Logged

Offline DanClrk51

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Location: Bellevue
  • Posts: 1128
Re: Background check failed the Senate.
« Reply #31 on: April 17, 2013, 05:52:00 PM »
Now Manchin is using the families and teary eyed victims. This is disgusting how they are portraying that the amendment was common sense. They completely ignore the other garbage that was in it which would have reduced our rights.
Logged

Offline Gary

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Feb 2013
  • Location: Lincoln
  • Posts: 1199
    • Guns 2 Roses
Re: Background check failed the Senate.
« Reply #32 on: April 17, 2013, 05:57:28 PM »
Two more bills to vote on tomorrow, noonish their time.
Logged

Offline Phantom

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Feb 2012
  • Location: Omaha/Bellevue
  • Posts: 503
Re: Background check failed the Senate.
« Reply #33 on: April 17, 2013, 06:16:27 PM »
Quote from: unfy on April 17, 2013, 03:59:43 PM
edit: i suck at typing
Must be the Powder coating on your fingers   :laugh::P
Logged
"If the primates that we came from had known that someday politicians would come out of the...the gene pool, they'd a stayed up in the trees and written evolution off as a bad idea.....Hell, I always thought the opposable thumb was overrated.  "-- Sheridan, "Babylon 5"

Offline unfy

  • Lead Benefactor
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Location: TN (was La Vista, NE)
  • Posts: 1830
  • !!! SCIENCE !!!
Re: Background check failed the Senate.
« Reply #34 on: April 17, 2013, 06:20:12 PM »
Quote from: DanClrk51 on April 17, 2013, 05:50:48 PM
Not sure CSpan is saying 7 amendments were defeated

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-politics/wp/2013/04/17/senate-to-vote-on-amendments-to-gun-bill-with-background-check-plan-in-doubt/

Quote
A number of other amendments also failed to earn the 60 votes necessary to pass: A GOP proposal including a number of changes, 52 to 48; a bipartisan amendment to stiffen penalties for “straw purchasers,” 58 to 42; a GOP-backed amendment that would have permitted “national reciprocity” of state-issued concealed carry permits, 57 to 43; a GOP plan to extend gun rights for veterans, including those deemed unable to manage their financial affairs, 56-44; and a Democratic amendment to limit the size of ammunition magazines, 54-46.
Logged
hoppe's #9 is not the end all be all woman catching pheramone people make it out to be ... cause i smell of it 2 or 3 times a week but remain single  >:D

Offline unfy

  • Lead Benefactor
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Location: TN (was La Vista, NE)
  • Posts: 1830
  • !!! SCIENCE !!!
Re: Background check failed the Senate.
« Reply #35 on: April 17, 2013, 06:23:10 PM »
Logged
hoppe's #9 is not the end all be all woman catching pheramone people make it out to be ... cause i smell of it 2 or 3 times a week but remain single  >:D

Offline unfy

  • Lead Benefactor
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Location: TN (was La Vista, NE)
  • Posts: 1830
  • !!! SCIENCE !!!
Re: Background check failed the Senate.
« Reply #36 on: April 17, 2013, 06:27:41 PM »
Sorry for post bloat

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/04/17/1202553/-Senate-prepares-to-vote-on-nine-gun-amendments-Few-will-be-approved

Quote
• Manchin-Toomey amendment
• Grassley substitute amendment: would provide more money for school safety, for stepped-up prosecution of felons, and for mental health; stepped-up prosecutions of felons who try to get guns; allow interstate transport of guns
• Leahy-Collins amendment: would impose tougher penalties on gun trafficking and straw purchasers
• Cornyn amendment: would federalize interstate reciprocity for concealed-carry permits
• Feinstein amendment: would ban assault weapons and impose an ammunition magazine limit of 10 rounds
• Burr amendment: would mandate that people can only be barred from buying firearms for mental health reasons when a judicial authority has made that determination
• Lautenberg-Blumenthal amendment: would impose a limit of 10 rounds in ammunition magazines
• Barrasso amendment: would penalize states and constituent jurisdictions for releasing gun data regarding private citizens
• Harkin-Alexander amendment: Mental health programs in schools

Reading the text of the Collins amendment... uhhhh.... that's an AWB, not a straw purchase thing.  WTF ?
Logged
hoppe's #9 is not the end all be all woman catching pheramone people make it out to be ... cause i smell of it 2 or 3 times a week but remain single  >:D

Offline Lmbass14

  • Powder Benefactor
  • *
  • Join Date: Mar 2011
  • Posts: 870
  • Red Horse - Semper Ducimus
Re: Background check failed the Senate.
« Reply #37 on: April 17, 2013, 06:28:04 PM »
Got this from NRA:

Today, the misguided Manchin-Toomey-Schumer proposal failed 54-46 in the U.S. Senate. Six other amendments were also defeated:

Grassley-Cruz-Graham substitute amendment – Failed 52-48
Leahy-Collins trafficking amendment – Failed 58-42
Cornyn right-to-carry reciprocity amendment – Failed 57-43
Feinstein gun & magazine ban amendment – Failed 40-60
Burr protection of veterans’ gun rights amendment – Failed 56-44
Launtenberg-Blumenthal magazine ban amendment – Failed 46-54

See how your Senators voted here: http://tinyurl.com/acpl6sy
Logged

Offline unfy

  • Lead Benefactor
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Location: TN (was La Vista, NE)
  • Posts: 1830
  • !!! SCIENCE !!!
Re: Background check failed the Senate.
« Reply #38 on: April 17, 2013, 06:37:57 PM »
Quote from: unfy on April 17, 2013, 06:27:41 PM
Reading the text of the Collins amendment... uhhhh.... that's an AWB, not a straw purchase thing.  WTF ?

OK, I suck at the Internet or using indexes.

It was in relation to straw purchase stuff and horribly done at that heh.
Logged
hoppe's #9 is not the end all be all woman catching pheramone people make it out to be ... cause i smell of it 2 or 3 times a week but remain single  >:D

Offline GreyGeek

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Dec 2012
  • Posts: 1687
Re: Background check failed the Senate.
« Reply #39 on: April 17, 2013, 06:44:23 PM »
Quote from: unfy on April 17, 2013, 03:59:43 PM
edit: i suck at typing

But not at posting interesting technical msgs!
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up
« previous next »