As a "real guns only have wood stocks and glossy bluing" kind of guy, it pains me to admit this. I handled and shot a friend's AR recently (short barrel so technically an M4 maybe... whatever...) and it was pretty neat. Not a lot of tacticool rails and lights and sirens and stuff stuck all over it; nice and basic. And lighter than I expected. My son just passed his hunter safety and may want to get a deer this year, and I couldn't help but think with it's light weight and adjustable stock, it might not make a bad first deer rifle.
I always thought, nah, that caliber is too light and a hunting with an AR is just kinda ... gauche. Maybe I was wrong. I keep hearing of more and more younguns who do a fine job getting their first deer with that caliber and 'platform'.
So, without getting too much into the discussion of whether the caliber is enough for deer, what do you all think of the new breed of budget ARs that have cropped up in the last couple years? Some co-workers have recently bought the S&W "sports" and Ruger's new budget offering, and seem to like them very much. Are they all they're cracked up to be? Do they typically come with a rifling twist that would work for heavier-bullet loads one would use for game? Any brands to stay away from?
I'm just starting to surf the 'web and read up on all this since I'm not even fully fluent on the difference between 5.56 and .223.