I just don't understand how he could have inflicted bullet wounds on them, since the government had stripped him of his 2A rights. Can someone who's better informed please explain this to me?
I think the point was stripping people of their rights for any reason is idiotic because people who don't follow the law don't follow the law.
No amount of laws will keep bad guys from doing bad things or getting hold of guns. Many laws just hurt the general populace while being ignored by criminals, it's nearing impossible to remember and comply with all of them.
There should be no negotiation or limitation of 2a, period. Only: you do the crime, you do the time.