< Back to the Main Site

Author Topic: "High Capacity" magazine ban introduced 1/18/11  (Read 2179 times)

Offline FarmerRick

  • NFOA Co-Founder
  • *****
  • Join Date: Mar 2008
  • Location: Valley, NE
  • Posts: 3250
  • Antagonist of liberals, anti-hunters & hoplophobes
"High Capacity" magazine ban introduced 1/18/11
« on: January 19, 2011, 04:32:14 PM »
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h112-308

H.R. 308:
To prohibit the transfer or possession of large capacity ammunition feeding devices, and for other purposes.

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the ?Large Capacity Ammunition Feeding Device Act?.
SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON TRANSFER OR POSSESSION OF LARGE CAPACITY AMMUNITION FEEDING DEVICES.
(a) Definition- Section 921(a) of title 18, United States Code, is amended by inserting after paragraph (29) the following:
?(30) The term ?large capacity ammunition feeding device?--
?(A) means a magazine, belt, drum, feed strip, or similar device that has a capacity of, or that can be readily restored or converted to accept, more than 10 rounds of ammunition; but
?(B) does not include an attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition.?.
(b) Prohibitions- Section 922 of such title is amended by inserting after subsection (u) the following:
?(v)(1)(A)(i) Except as provided in clause (ii), it shall be unlawful for a person to transfer or possess a large capacity ammunition feeding device.
?(ii) Clause (i) shall not apply to the possession of a large capacity ammunition feeding device otherwise lawfully possessed within the United States on or before the date of the enactment of this subsection.
?(B) It shall be unlawful for any person to import or bring into the United States a large capacity ammunition feeding device.
?(2) Paragraph (1) shall not apply to--
?(A) a manufacture for, transfer to, or possession by the United States or a department or agency of the United States or a State or a department, agency, or political subdivision of a State, or a transfer to or possession by a law enforcement officer employed by such an entity for purposes of law enforcement (whether on or off duty);
?(B) a transfer to a licensee under title I of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954 for purposes of establishing and maintaining an on-site physical protection system and security organization required by Federal law, or possession by an employee or contractor of such a licensee on-site for such purposes or off-site for purposes of licensee-authorized training or transportation of nuclear materials;
?(C) the possession, by an individual who is retired from service with a law enforcement agency and is not otherwise prohibited from receiving ammunition, of a large capacity ammunition feeding device transferred to the individual by the agency upon that retirement; or
?(D) a manufacture, transfer, or possession of a large capacity ammunition feeding device by a licensed manufacturer or licensed importer for the purposes of testing or experimentation authorized by the Attorney General.?.
(c) Penalties- Section 924(a) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following:
?(8 ) Whoever knowingly violates section 922(v) shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.?.
(d) Identification Markings- Section 923(i) of such title is amended by adding at the end the following: ?A large capacity ammunition feeding device manufactured after the date of the enactment of this sentence shall be identified by a serial number that clearly shows that the device was manufactured after such date of enactment, and such other identification as the Attorney General may by regulation prescribe.?.
« Last Edit: January 19, 2011, 04:33:17 PM by FarmerRick »
Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety.

Offline justsomeguy

  • Defender of the Constitution
  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Location: Behind my Rifle
  • Posts: 284
Re: "High Capacity" magazine ban introduced 1/18/11
« Reply #1 on: January 19, 2011, 04:37:28 PM »
That'll never pass in the current house.

Thank God!
"The first rule is to keep an untroubled spirit. The second is to look things in the face and know them for what they are." - Marcus Aurelius

A-FIXER

  • Guest
Re: "High Capacity" magazine ban introduced 1/18/11
« Reply #2 on: January 19, 2011, 04:47:07 PM »
Damn leftys....and uninformed
« Last Edit: January 21, 2011, 03:56:45 PM by Dan W »

Offline DanClrk51

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Location: Bellevue
  • Posts: 1128
Re: "High Capacity" magazine ban introduced 1/18/11
« Reply #3 on: January 22, 2011, 01:09:50 AM »
Yeah, thank God the Republicans have a good majority now. I don't see this even being considered.

Offline David Hineline

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Location: South Sioux City
  • Posts: 562
Re: "High Capacity" magazine ban introduced 1/18/11
« Reply #4 on: January 22, 2011, 07:01:24 AM »
And while we slept in our imagined comfort trusting in the NRA and Republican president Ronald Regan the 1986 ban of machineguns was signed into law.
Machinegun owners blow thier load with one pull of the trigger

A-FIXER

  • Guest
Re: "High Capacity" magazine ban introduced 1/18/11
« Reply #5 on: January 22, 2011, 08:50:36 AM »
Well, that busted my bubble

Offline Lorimor

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Nov 2008
  • Location: Platte County
  • Posts: 1077
  • Relay 2
Re: "High Capacity" magazine ban introduced 1/18/11
« Reply #6 on: January 22, 2011, 09:16:08 AM »
Who do these clowns think they're fooling?  How many MILLION "high cap" mags are already in existence? 

Morons.
"It is better to avoid than to run; better to run than to de-escalate; better to de-escalate than to fight; better to fight than to die. The very essence of self-defense is a thin list of things that might get you out alive when you are already screwed." – Rory Miller

Offline David Hineline

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Dec 2007
  • Location: South Sioux City
  • Posts: 562
Re: "High Capacity" magazine ban introduced 1/18/11
« Reply #7 on: January 22, 2011, 10:58:53 PM »
Who do these clowns think they're fooling?  How many MILLION "high cap" mags are already in existence? 

Morons.

About as many as there used to be in Austrailia
Machinegun owners blow thier load with one pull of the trigger

Offline altheman2

  • Powder Benefactor
  • *
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Location: South Central NE
  • Posts: 161
Re: "High Capacity" magazine ban introduced 1/18/11
« Reply #8 on: January 22, 2011, 11:24:44 PM »
Glad you guys dont think it will  pass....dont have the money to buy a bunch of  mags lol

Offline Dan W

  • NFOA Co-Founder
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Location: Lincoln NE
  • Posts: 8143
Re: "High Capacity" magazine ban introduced 1/18/11
« Reply #9 on: January 23, 2011, 01:01:42 PM »
It can be stopped, but we need to work hard at making sure it is.
Dan W    NFOA Co Founder
Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom.   J. F. K.

Offline SeanN

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jul 2009
  • Location: Omaha, NE
  • Posts: 535
Re: "High Capacity" magazine ban introduced 1/18/11
« Reply #10 on: January 25, 2011, 02:36:13 PM »
I just bought ten 30 round pmags just in case.  ::)

A-FIXER

  • Guest
Re: "High Capacity" magazine ban introduced 1/18/11
« Reply #11 on: January 25, 2011, 10:22:54 PM »
As I watched the state of the union, Even the president knows now is not the time to employ or enforce unconstitutional restrictions though many congressmen sought to '' Drop the Hammer'' on Gun control and related items.....