< Back to the Main Site

Author Topic: Sherriffs First  (Read 1325 times)

Offline stutzcattle

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 88
Sherriffs First
« on: January 24, 2011, 10:07:54 AM »
Don't know if you guys have seen this yet. 

            HOUSE BILL NO.

INTRODUCED BY _______________________________________________________________________________

 

A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED: "AN ACT REGULATING ARRESTS, SEARCHES, AND SEIZURES BY FEDERAL EMPLOYEES; PROVIDING THAT FEDERAL EMPLOYEES SHALL OBTAIN THE COUNTY SHERIFF'S PERMISSION TO ARREST, SEARCH, AND SEIZE; PROVIDING FOR PROSECUTION OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES VIOLATING THIS ACT; REJECTING FEDERAL LAWS PURPORTING TO GIVE FEDERAL EMPLOYEES THE AUTHORITY OF A COUNTY SHERIFF IN THIS STATE; AND PROVIDING AN IMMEDIATE EFFECTIVE DATE."

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF NEBRASKA:

 

1.           Purpose.  It is the intent of the legislature to ensure maximum cooperation between federal employees and local law enforcement authorities; to ensure that federal employees who carry out arrests, searches, and seizures in this state receive the best local knowledge and expertise available; and to prevent misadventure affecting Nebraska citizens and their rights that results from lack of cooperation or communication between federal employees operating in Nebraska and properly constituted local law enforcement authorities.

 

 

2.         Declaration.  The elected sheriff of each county is the senior law enforcement officer of that county and is the most authoritative law enforcement official in the county.  The primary duties of the sheriff are to keep the peace in the county and to secure and protect the liberties and security of the residents of the county.

 

3.           County sheriff's permission for federal arrests, searches, and seizures -- exceptions.  (1)  A federal employee who is not designated by Nebraska law as a Nebraska peace officer may not make an arrest, search, or seizure in this state without the written permission of the sheriff or designee of the sheriff of the county in which the arrest, search, or seizure will occur unless:

            (a)  the arrest, search, or seizure will take place on a federal enclave for which jurisdiction has been actively ceded to the United States of America by a Nebraska statute;

            (b)  the federal employee witnesses the commission of a crime the nature of which requires an immediate arrest;

            (c)  the arrest, search, or seizure is under the provisions of 29-417 (fresh pursuit);

            (d)  the intended subject of the arrest, search, or seizure is an employee of the sheriff's office or is an elected county or state officer; or

            (e)  the federal employee has probable cause to believe that the subject of the arrest, search, or seizure has close connections with the sheriff, which connections are likely to result in the subject being informed of the impending arrest, search, or seizure.

            (2)  The county sheriff or designee of the sheriff may refuse permission for any reason that the sheriff or designee considers sufficient.

            (3)  A federal employee who desires to exercise a subsection (1)(d) exception shall obtain the written permission of the Nebraska attorney general for the arrest, search, or seizure unless the resulting delay in obtaining the permission would probably cause serious harm to one or more individuals or to a community or would probably cause flight of the subject of the arrest, search, or seizure in order to avoid prosecution.  The attorney general may refuse the permission for any reason that the attorney general considers sufficient.

            (4)  A federal employee who desires to exercise a subsection (1)(e) exception shall obtain the written permission of the Nebraska attorney general.  The request for permission must include a written statement, under oath, describing the federal employee's probable cause.  The attorney general may refuse the request for any reason that the attorney general considers sufficient.

            (5) (a)  A permission request to the county sheriff or Nebraska attorney general must contain:

            (i)  the name of the subject of the arrest, search, or seizure;

            (ii)  a clear statement of probable cause for the arrest, search, or seizure or a federal arrest, search, or seizure warrant that contains a clear statement of probable cause;

            (iii)  a description of specific assets, if any, to be searched for or seized;

            (iv)  a statement of the date and time that the arrest, search, or seizure is to occur; and

            (v)  the address or location where the intended arrest, search, or seizure will be attempted.

            (b)  The request may be in letter form, either typed or handwritten, but must be countersigned with the original signature of the county sheriff or designee of the sheriff or by the Nebraska attorney general, to constitute valid permission.  The permission is valid for 48 hours after it is signed.  The sheriff or attorney general shall keep a copy of the permission request on file.

 

4.           Remedies.  (1)  An arrest, search, or seizure or attempted arrest, search, or seizure in violation of [section 2] is unlawful, and individuals involved must be prosecuted by the county attorney for kidnapping if an arrest or attempted arrest occurred, for trespass if a search or attempted search occurred, for theft if a seizure or attempted seizure occurred, and for any applicable homicide offense if loss of life occurred.  The individuals involved must also be charged with any other applicable criminal offenses in Chapter 28;

            (2)  To the extent possible, the victims' rights provisions of chapter 81-1848 must be extended to the victim or victims by the justice system persons and entities involved in the prosecution.

            (3)  The county attorney has no discretion not to prosecute once a claim of violation of [section 2] has been made by the county sheriff or designee of the sheriff, and failure to abide by this mandate subjects the county attorney to recall by the voters and to prosecution by the attorney general for official misconduct.

 

5.           Invalid federal laws.  Pursuant to the 10th amendment to the United States constitution and this state's compact with the other states, the legislature declares that any federal law purporting to give federal employees the authority of a county sheriff in this state is not recognized by and is specifically rejected by this state and is declared to be invalid in this state.

 

6.           Effective date.  [This act] is effective on passage and approval.

 

7.           Severability.  If a part of [this act] is invalid, all valid parts that are severable from the invalid part remain in effect. If a part of [this act] is invalid in one or more of its applications, the part remains in effect in all valid applications that are severable from the invalid applications.

            -END-

 


Offline justsomeguy

  • Defender of the Constitution
  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Location: Behind my Rifle
  • Posts: 284
Re: Sherriffs First
« Reply #1 on: January 24, 2011, 10:47:55 AM »
Montana is trying this very thing right now.

There appears to be some problems with the "supremacy clause".
Anyone familiar with this?
"The first rule is to keep an untroubled spirit. The second is to look things in the face and know them for what they are." - Marcus Aurelius

Offline equinox137

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 31
Re: Sherriffs First
« Reply #2 on: February 17, 2011, 12:20:25 AM »
This would get struck down in federal court in less than a minute.  Yes, the supremecy clause applies.

Any local LEO actually attempting to arrest a federal agent based on this statute would be facing federal obstruction charges himself/herself in short order.

This is only grandstanding by some elected idiot.  Nothing to see here.

Offline ComputerCowboy

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Jun 2010
  • Location: Omaha, NE.
  • Posts: 42
  • R A Manard (R A or Alan)
Re: Sherriffs First
« Reply #3 on: February 17, 2011, 12:45:03 AM »
Is this real? Please include a link of some kind. Thanks.

Offline equinox137

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Apr 2010
  • Posts: 31
Re: Sherriffs First
« Reply #4 on: February 17, 2011, 10:43:52 AM »
I doubt it.

Offline justsomeguy

  • Defender of the Constitution
  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Dec 2009
  • Location: Behind my Rifle
  • Posts: 284
"The first rule is to keep an untroubled spirit. The second is to look things in the face and know them for what they are." - Marcus Aurelius

Offline bullit

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 2143
Re: Sherriffs First
« Reply #6 on: February 17, 2011, 12:04:44 PM »
Sheriff Joe of AZ abides by this already.  He is the Senior LEO of that county and "makes the rules" as the elected offical entrusted with such a position.  Works out there.

Offline Ronvandyn

  • Pollywog
  • Powder Benefactor
  • *
  • Join Date: Sep 2009
  • Location: Bellevue NE
  • Posts: 561
Re: Sherriffs First
« Reply #7 on: February 17, 2011, 01:46:38 PM »
A law like this would not survive the first constitutional challenge.   

Ron
NE-CHP Holder, USAF Veteran, NRA Member,  ENGC Member
KC0MXX

Offline stutzcattle

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: May 2009
  • Posts: 88
Re: Sherriffs First
« Reply #8 on: March 29, 2011, 11:40:40 AM »
Much of the federal gov't as it stands should not withstand the first test of constitutionality.