I totally agree it is a ridiculous assault on our rights. It won't help any that yesterday, a child at an elementary school here in Lincoln was found in possession of an airsoft pellet gun. More fuel for the crazy anti-gun crowd. I don't know if anyone has ever fought these ordinances in court, but I sure wish someone would. I'm not sure what could be done about the ones that ban providing these toy guns to children, but I think a person could fight and win if charged with discharging one in the city limits. I think it would come down to the definition of "in a such a manner as to endanger people or property". I on occassion shoot a pellet gun in my back yard, but I shoot into metal trap at the base of my wooden fence, either of which would stop the pellets from traveling beyond my property. I would certainly fight it if I were charged under this ordinance, as I don't think they could prove I was endangering people or property.
I think the section regarding toy guns and children was adopted for two reasons. One, kids will shoot at each other with these toy guns, and depending on the gun and situation, there could (and probably have been) injuries (bb to the eye, etc.). The other is the chance that a toy gun will be mistaken for a real gun and result in a child being shot by someone else with real gun who may be fearing for their own life. I can understand those "justifications" but in either case, proper upbringing and training by the parents would all but eliminate those situations.