w11b...Yes that is VERY surprising. Would not have expected that in a bizillion x 2 years.
Regarding the OPs experience. I would agree that, overall, you had a good first experience with LEO, and I don't want to pee in your Cheerios. However, I still do not understand why LEO feel that securing your firearm is necessary. Nor do I understand why we should be required to relinquish our personal property, even temporarily, when the officer has no suspicion of our wrong doing or intent to do wrong. Maybe there is a real life scenario that has played out which gives some credence to an officer disarming a CHP holder. If anyone knows of such evidence, please speak up. Until then, I have to speak my mind.
Why would a person intent on doing the officer harm inform the officer of a concealed weapon? I'm sure there are examples where officers pull someone over and the situation escalate into a violent confronation, but how many of those occur with a CHP holder? I'm betting very infrequently, if ever. And if it does happen, it is likely statistically much less common compared with non-CHP holders.
Again, I agree it was an over all positive experience, but it could have been even better. Just my two cents.
Fly