< Back to the Main Site

Author Topic: GOA- Here’s where we are on Obama's gun control proposals:  (Read 684 times)

Offline Dan W

  • NFOA Co-Founder
  • *****
  • Join Date: Oct 2007
  • Location: Lincoln NE
  • Posts: 8143
GOA- Here’s where we are on Obama's gun control proposals:
« on: March 13, 2013, 09:49:13 PM »
Gun Owners of America

    Today, the Nut-Left Democrats on the Senate Judiciary voted to report the Feinstein gun ban –which could ban between 50% and 80% of guns and magazines in circulation today. It may not even get a majority in the Senate – much less the 60 votes needed to pass. And it is being pushed primarily to allow anti-gun Democrats from pro-gun states to pretend to be pro-gun.
    Tuesday, the Judiciary Committee passed, by a 10-to-8 vote, the universal gun registry bill. Chief sponsor Chuck Schumer has been unable to achieve Republican support from anyone other than the anti-gun Illinois Republican Mark Kirk. Therefore, unless another Republican sells out at the last minute, we believe we can successfully filibuster this ill in the full Senate.
    Tuesday, by a vote of 14-to-4, the Judiciary Committee also reported a Boxer bill that would increase, by $10 million, the funding for an existing school safety program. The money could be used for armed guards, as the NRA proposes, or it could be used for an anti-gun study. It is therefore neither inherently “pro-gun” nor “anti-gun.” We have said we would oppose proceeding to Boxer if it is a vehicle for votes on other anti-gun measures – but that we would not object to its passage, without amendment, by “unanimous consent.”
    This brings us to the central battlefield: Last week, the committee reported, by a vote of 11-to-7, the Veterans Gun Ban, S. 54. The lone GOP vote in favor came from Chuck Grassley, who indicated he would oppose the bill on the Senate floor unless it was improved from the committee-reported version.

As we see it, the chief strategic objective is now to keep gun control votes from coming to the Senate floor by opposing the “motion to proceed” to any bill which is going to be used as a vehicle for gun votes.
 
That would certainly mean that senators should oppose moving to proceed to universal gun registries or the Veterans Gun Ban. But it also means that we oppose moving to proceed to so-called non-controversial bills, such as Boxer, if those bills are being brought up as a vehicle for anti-gun amendments.
 
ACTION: Click here to contact your senator.
http://capwiz.com/gunowners/issues/alert/?alertid=62506136
Ask him to oppose any motion to proceed – by filibuster if necessary – to the Feinstein gun ban, the universal gun registry bill, the Veterans Gun Ban (S. 54), or to any other piece of legislation being brought up as a vehicle for votes on these anti-gun proposals.
Dan W    NFOA Co Founder
Today, we need a nation of Minutemen, citizens who are not only prepared to take arms, but citizens who regard the preservation of freedom as the basic purpose of their daily life and who are willing to consciously work and sacrifice for that freedom.   J. F. K.

A-FIXER

  • Guest
Re: GOA- Here’s where we are on Obama's gun control proposals:
« Reply #1 on: March 13, 2013, 10:42:56 PM »
Done not just to mine but to others as well

warmboots

  • Guest
Re: GOA- Here’s where we are on Obama's gun control proposals:
« Reply #2 on: March 14, 2013, 01:53:16 AM »
DONE!

warmboots

  • Guest
Re: GOA- Here’s where we are on Obama's gun control proposals:
« Reply #3 on: March 14, 2013, 02:13:59 AM »
Please put this same info. on :
nfoa full members area /new topic

It's hiding in here. It takes awhile to figure out the website. :)

Offline RedDot

  • NFOA Full Member
  • **
  • Join Date: Dec 2010
  • Location: Omaha
  • Posts: 357
Re: GOA- Here’s where we are on Obama's gun control proposals:
« Reply #4 on: March 14, 2013, 09:05:18 PM »
Gun Owners of America

    Tuesday, by a vote of 14-to-4, the Judiciary Committee also reported a Boxer bill that would increase, by $10 million, the funding for an existing school safety program. The money could be used for armed guards, as the NRA proposes, or it could be used for an anti-gun study.

I love how it seems to cost as much to sit around and talk about doing something as it does to actually do it.  Even better, that sitting around and talking will undoubtedly be hailed as "taking action"  ???