NFOA MEMBERS FORUM

General Categories => Carry Issues => Topic started by: huskergun on January 18, 2009, 12:06:39 AM

Title: Store owner not charged .....self defence.
Post by: huskergun on January 18, 2009, 12:06:39 AM

Who says that "assualt weapons" can't be used for protection.
Notice however one thing  in the article....When they are talking about the gun used in self defence they refer to it as simply an SKS semi automatic rifle. If this would have been the criminal useing the SKS they would have called it an "assualt weapon". The ban crowd would have jumped all over it and the sheep would have followed.
 

http://www.omaha.com/index.php?u_page=2798&u_sid=10539859

Title: Re: Store owner not charged .....self defence.
Post by: Mike M. on January 18, 2009, 11:41:26 AM

Yes and Wakefields wife cant understand why murder charges arent being filed. Duh   Your husband fired first.
Did they ever say anything about the 9mm. Was it owned leagally and being carried with permits?

Title: Re: Store owner not charged .....self defence.
Post by: Rich B on January 18, 2009, 12:55:47 PM

Why do I have a feeling the store owner will face retaliation? 

Title: Re: Store owner not charged .....self defence.
Post by: Aldo on January 18, 2009, 02:46:24 PM

Quote from: Rich B on January 18, 2009, 12:55:47 PM

Why do I have a feeling the store owner will face retaliation? 

Yep, and it probably won't be while he's standing behind his counter and within reach of his gun.

Title: Re: Store owner not charged .....self defence.
Post by: Mike M. on January 18, 2009, 03:07:50 PM

Todays paper said he wasnt going to reopen the shop. Too bad that wont help him. Hopefully we are wrong obout that and they dont try for revenge.

Title: Re: Store owner not charged .....self defence.
Post by: Randy on January 18, 2009, 04:29:02 PM

Don't blame him perhaps has some PTSD.

Title: Re: Store owner not charged .....self defence.
Post by: David Hineline on January 28, 2009, 05:02:26 AM

Same thing happened at that Benson area jewelry store.  They tried to keep the business going but continued threats made them move out.

Title: Re: Store owner not charged .....self defence.
Post by: JimP on January 28, 2009, 10:52:34 PM

Quote from: David Hineline on January 28, 2009, 05:02:26 AM

Same thing happened at that Benson area jewelry store.  They tried to keep the business going but continued threats made them move out.

Yeah, he'd be a damn fool to be a sitting duck in that store: those choirboys he gunned down have "ASSOCIATES".......